Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204417›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020

Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy following the new scoring system in Duhok governorate: Cross sectional study.

Sanar Majeed Jameel, Muwafaq Masoud Bahaddin, Ayad Ahmad Mohammed

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04994171 (Operative Difficulty Grading Scale for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in BPKIHS), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04994171 completednot on this map

Operative Difficulty Grading Scale for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in BPKIHS

TypeobservationalSponsorB.P. Koirala Institute of Health SciencesRan2020 to 2021Enrolled74ConditionsLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Establishment and Application of a Grading Management Model for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanar Majeed JameelSenior House Officer in General Surgery, Azadi Teaching Hospital, Directorate General of Health, DUHOK, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Muwafaq Masoud BahaddinDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Duhok, DUHOK, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Ayad Ahmad MohammedDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Duhok, DUHOK, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
University of Duhok · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNumerous preoperative scoring systems predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Recently, the intraoperative difficulties which are facing surgeons are studied. A new scoring system categorize patients according to many intraoperative findings with a final outcome whether converting to open cholecystectomy or continuing laparoscopically. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis prospective study included 120 patients admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones from October 2019 to August 2020. Intraoperative difficulties were evaluated and patients were categorized according to intraoperative scoring for cholecystitis severity and compared depending to the rate of conversion to the open technique.

resultsMost patient were middle aged females having multiple gallstones, the mean operation time was 35 min and 7.8% of patients were converted to open cholecystectomy because of intraoperative difficulty.There was a significant correlation between the conversion rate and each of distended and/or contracted gall bladder, inability to grasp the gall bladder with traumatic forceps, stone ≥1 cm impacted in Hartman's pouch, and bile or pus outside gallbladder (P values: 0.002, 0.000, 0.008 and 0.015) respectively, and no significant correlation with gallbladder adhesions, adhesions from previous upper abdominal surgery, BMI>30, and Time to identify cystic artery and duct >90 min (P values: 0.123, 1, 1, 0.078) respectively.

conclusionNew intraoperative scoring systems are valuable in predicting difficulties and preventing increase operation time and possible injuries. The main points of difficulties are distended or contracted gallbladder, large stone impaction, difficult grasping the wall of the gall bladder and the presence of bile or pus outside the gall bladder.

Indexed as

Difficult cholecystectomyGallbladder adhesionsGallstonesIntraoperative scoring systemLaparoscopic cholecystectomyOpen cholecystectomy

Identifiers

PMID33204417
PMCPMC7649370
OpenAlexW3093496995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.