Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204354›Full record

ArticleJournal of children's orthopaedics2020

Autologous cartilage and fibrin sealant may be superior to conventional fat grafting in preventing physeal bone bridge formation - a pilot study in porcines.

Ahmed A Abood, Bjarne Møller-Madsen, Juan Manuel Shiguetomi-Medina, Hans Stødkilde-Jørgensen, Casper Foldager, Ole Rahbek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Management of Physeal Fractures: A Review Article.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed A AboodDepartment of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bjarne Møller-MadsenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Juan Manuel Shiguetomi-MedinaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hans Stødkilde-JørgensenMR-center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Casper FoldagerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ole RahbekDepartment of Orthopaedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKAalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe article compares physeal recovery after insertion of autologous cartilage and a conventional fat graft in a standardized porcine physeal gap model. Presence of a bone bridge was the primary outcome.

methodsTen porcines in two groups of five were included in a paired design. A standardized physeal gap in the distal femur was made in all animals. One group (n = 5) was randomized for deposition of autologous cartilage and a Tisseel

resultsMRI - Three bone bridges were seen in the fat grafted gaps. All empty gaps formed a bone bridge. No gaps filled with autologous cartilage and Tisseel

conclusionsFat grafts seems ineffective in preventing bone bridges. The use of autologous cartilage may be superior to the current treatment. However, donor site complications were not investigated. The study serves as a proof of concept study and requires further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

bone bridgescartilage graftfat graft

Identifiers

PMID33204354
PMCPMC7666797
OpenAlexW3092548494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.