ArticleJournal of children's orthopaedics2020
Efficacy of corticosteroid in decreasing scoliosis and extending time to loss of ambulation in a single clinic: an effectiveness trial.
Article in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of intermittent corticosteroids on scoliosis, bone density, and vertebral fractures in duchenne muscular dystrophy.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- What's new in the pediatric spine?Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Relationship between growth and ambulation loss in Duchenne muscular dystrophy boys on steroids.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Current Concepts in the Orthopaedic Management of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024Review
- A Mixed-Method Study Exploring Patient-Experienced and Caregiver-Reported Benefits and Side Effects of Corticosteroid Use in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2023Article
- No difference in postoperative complication rates or cardiopulmonary function for early versus late scoliosis correction in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Spine deformity · 2022Article
- The Relationship between Obesity and Clinical Outcomes in Young People with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Lessons Learned From Translational Research in Neuromuscular Diseases: Impact on Study Design, Outcome Measures and Managing Expectation.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePharmacologic doses of corticosteroid (CS) have been shown to ameliorate the progression of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) preserving strength, pulmonary function and ambulation as well as reducing the incidence of scoliosis. However, there are serious side effects of CS, which may impact dose tolerance. The purpose of this study was to compare the magnitude of positive CS effects on patients in our clinic to those reported in the literature.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records and radiographs of 142 DMD patients who were seen between 1st January 1991 and 31st December 2017.
resultsIn total, 101 boys met study inclusion criteria. Of these 32 were steroid naïve, 37 took the recommended dose (standard of care, SOC) of Prednisone or Deflazacort, and 32 took a lower dose (LD). Following initiation of CS, both treatment groups showed an increase in weight velocity and decrease in linear growth velocity. Although there was a trend to later loss of ambulation (LOA) in the SOC group relative to the naïve group by one year, this was not significant, however, a small subgroup of boys on Deflazacort showed a 3.4 year later LOA than the naïve group. The incidence of scoliosis was reduced from 69% in the naïve, to 41% in the LD and 47% in the SOC group.
conclusionsAlthough there was a reduction in the incidence of scoliosis, it was not as robust as seen elsewhere. Many published studies have inadequate data on scoliosis probably due to the lack of inclusion of orthopaedists in the study group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.