Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204159›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2020

Prognostic Significance of Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Breast Cancer Skeletal Metastases.

Yuan Wang, Guilin Huang, Zhigang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Harnessing hematological ratios: prognostic insights for breast cancer management.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A Rare Case of Small Bowel Ulceration Induced by COVID-19.Journal of inflammation research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuan WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Mammary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, 832000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7980-4228
Guilin HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Mammary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, 832000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3270-8842
Zhigang LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Mammary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, 832000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSkeletal metastases are a common problem in breast cancer patients. Identifying new prognostic factors can improve survival estimations and guide healthcare professionals in therapeutic decision-making. Our study aimed to determine the prognostic value of inflammatory biomarkers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) in patients with breast cancer skeletal metastases. PATIENTS AND

methodsClinical data from 212 patients with breast cancer skeletal metastases were retrospectively analyzed. The optimal cut-off values of each inflammatory biomarker were extracted from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Patients were divided into high-value and low-value groups according to the cut-off values of NLR, LMR, and CAR. We investigated the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers and clinicopathological characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to measure progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The survival difference was compared by the univariate analysis. Cox multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors.

resultsThe median age of the patients was 55 years, and the median follow-up was 45 months. LMR<3.43 (P<0.0001), NLR≥2.48 (P<0.0001), and CAR≥0.34 (P=0.035) were found to be associated with worse PFS in the univariate analysis. Meanwhile, LMR<3.43 (P<0.0001), NLR≥2.48 (P<0.0001), and CAR≥0.34 (P=0.025) were linked to the poor OS. The multivariate analysis revealed that NLR≥2.48 (HR 2.044, P=0.007) and LMR<3.43 (HR 0.532, P=0.012) were independent prognostic factors for OS; LMR<3.43 (HR 0.501; P=0.006) and NLR≥2.48 (HR 1.971, P=0.011) were similarly prognosticating worse PFS. Radiotherapy to the affected bone and ER (+) was favorable for the prognosis of breast cancer skeletal metastases. The number of involved sites of bone metastases>3 was adverse for PFS.

conclusionLMR<3.43 and NLR≥2.48 were independently associated with worse prognosis of patients of breast cancer skeletal metastases.

Indexed as

breast cancer skeletal metastasesinflammatory biomarkersoverall survivalprognostic factorprogression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID33204159
PMCPMC7665573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.