Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204095›Full record

ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2020

Inter-Gender Pelvic Shape Variations as a Cause of DDH Overdiagnosis.

Khalid M Abdalla, Mostafa A Abdelrahman, Abdelwahab J Aleshawi, Alaha S Al Taweel, Majid Bani-Ata, Khaled Obeidat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khalid M AbdallaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-4133-988X
Mostafa A AbdelrahmanDepartment of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-5891-509X
Abdelwahab J AleshawiDepartment of Special Surgery, Ophthalmology Division, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Alaha S Al TaweelDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-5189-0187
Majid Bani-AtaDepartment of Special Surgery, Otolaryngology Division, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Khaled ObeidatDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-2685-1009
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDevelopmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is an abnormal relationship between the acetabulum and the head of the femur. Plain x-ray of both hips at the age of 3 months is still in use in some countries. On plain films, classic lines and angles are evaluated to meet current guidelines for positive DDH. Among these is the acetabular angle (AA), which most did not exceed 30° in normal pelvis regardless of gender. A flat promontory gives the impression of a high AA angle, whereas a sharp promontory gives the impression of a low AA angle. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll anteroposterior (AP) pelvic digital x-ray studies performed to rule out DDH were collected from the PACS systems. A novel angle was measured between a line parallel to the lateral aspect of the region of the inferior iliac spines and a line that extends along the acetabular roof to quantify the roundness of the iliac promontory. We called the former line the Miral line and the formed angle the iliac promontory angle.

resultsWe show that the promontory shape is significantly different between genders, and therefore it is mistaken to generalize an upper AA limit for males and females. In addition, we show that the current guideline of the upper limit of AA did not predict the incidence of DDH.

conclusionWe suggest that the current practice is introducing a high rate of false positive, especially among females, and the current guidelines on AA should be reviewed and assigned separately for males and females. This is more important for countries that did not utilize the ultrasonographic assessment for DDH.

Indexed as

acetabular angleDDHhead of the femurplain x-ray

Identifiers

PMID33204095
PMCPMC7667170
OpenAlexW3102191074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.