Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204086›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2020

Effects of TiO

Vahid Mollabashi, Abbas Farmany, Mohammad Yousef Alikhani, Mohammad Sattari, Ali Reza Soltanian, Parnian Kahvand, Ziba Banisafar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Evaluation of Nano TiOBiological trace element research · 2023
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. How TiOInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Recent advances in antibacterial coatings for orthodontic appliances.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vahid MollabashiOrthodontic Department, Dental Faculty and Dental Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Abbas FarmanyDental Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Mohammad Yousef AlikhaniDepartment of Microbiology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4577-4029
Mohammad SattariDivision of Microstructure Physics, Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg SE-412 96, Sweden.
Ali Reza SoltanianModeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Parnian KahvandOrthodontic Department, Dental Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Ziba BanisafarOrthodontic Department, Dental Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-4689
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IRChalmers University of Technology · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to clinically evaluate

methodsIn this study, four groups of 17 patients each (n=68) aged 12-25 years participated. A titanium dioxide coating layer was deposited on 0.4572 mm stainless steel orthodontic wires using physical vapor deposition. The coated wires were randomly assigned to one jaw, and the opposite jaw received an uncoated wire as control. Patients were divided into groups according to the duration that wires were in their mouths: A) 1 week, B) 2 weeks, C) 3 weeks, and D) 4 weeks. Block randomization was used to assign patients to each group. At the end of the experiment, 20 mm of each wire (canine-to-canine area) was cut and cultured in

resultsThe Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there was no significant difference in colony counts among the coated wires during 1-4 weeks (

conclusionApplication of titanium dioxide coating is effective in reducing bacterial adhesion at wire insertion.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsBacterial AdhesionChildCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDogsHumansMaterials TestingOrthodontic WiresStainless SteelStreptococcus mutansSurface PropertiesTitaniumYoung AdultCoated Materials, BiocompatibleStainless SteelTitaniumtitanium dioxidebacterial adhesionorthodontic wireStreptococcus mutanstitanium dioxide

Identifiers

PMID33204086
PMCPMC7667015
OpenAlexW3103213162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.