Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204085›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2020

Intraclass Difference in Pneumonia Risk with Fluticasone and Budesonide in COPD: A Systematic Review of Evidence from Direct-Comparison Studies.

Thomas P Lodise, Jingyi Li, Hitesh N Gandhi, Gerald O'Brien, Sanjay Sethi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic review on long-term adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Implications ofChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Risk of AcquiringInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Inhaled corticosteroid dose is associated withBMJ open respiratory research · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas P LodiseDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Albany College Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, NY, USA.
Jingyi LiGlobal Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Hitesh N GandhiUS Respiratory Medical, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Gerald O'BrienUS Respiratory Medical, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Sanjay SethiDepartment of Medicine, University of Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0809-7604
AstraZeneca (United States) · USAlbany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USJacobs (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are widely used and recommended to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). While generally considered safe, several studies demonstrated an increased risk of pneumonia with the use of ICS in COPD patients. Although all ICS indicated for COPD carry the class labeling warning of increased pneumonia risk, evidence suggests an intraclass difference in the risk of pneumonia between inhaled budesonide and fluticasone. To date, systematic reviews of direct-comparison studies have not been performed to assess if an intraclass difference exists. Research Question: This review investigated whether there is an intraclass difference in risk of pneumonia between inhaled fluticasone and budesonide, the 2 most commonly used ICS in COPD. Study Design and Methods: A search of the medical literature was conducted in PubMed and Embase for the time period of 01/01/69-05/31/19. The search strategy combined terms that defined the patient/disease type, exposures, outcome, and the study/publication type. Descriptive and comparative statistics reported for fluticasone- and budesonide-containing products in each study, including data for pneumonia event subgroups, were extracted and reported by dose, seriousness, or practice setting. Controlled clinical trials and observational studies meeting the inclusion criteria were assessed for methodologic quality by using the appropriate tool from the list of study quality assessment tools developed by the National Institutes of Health. Results: The summary relative risk (RR) ratio across 5 included studies (57,199 patients) was 1.13 (95% CI: 1.09-1.19), representing a 13.5% increased risk of pneumonia among fluticasone users compared to budesonide users. Similarly, summary RR ratio for serious pneumonia implied a 14.4% increased risk of serious pneumonia among fluticasone users compared to budesonide users (pooled RR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.09-1.20). Interpretation: There is likely a clinically important intraclass difference in the risk of pneumonia between fluticasone- and budesonide-containing inhaled medications in COPD.

Indexed as

PneumoniaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideFluticasoneHumansAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideFluticasoneCOPDinhaled corticosteroidspneumonia

Identifiers

PMID33204085
PMCPMC7667513
OpenAlexW3101867353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.