Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204050›Full record

ArticlePhysica A2021

Social interaction layers in complex networks for the dynamical epidemic modeling of COVID-19 in Brazil.

Leonardo F S Scabini, Lucas C Ribas, Mariane B Neiva, Altamir G B Junior, Alex J F Farfán, Odemir M Bruno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Real-time updating of dynamic social networks for COVID-19 vaccination strategies.Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leonardo F S ScabiniScientific Computing Group, São Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo (USP), PO Box 369, 13560-970, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Lucas C RibasInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of São Paulo (USP), USP, Avenida Trabalhador são-carlense, 400, 13566-590, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Mariane B NeivaInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of São Paulo (USP), USP, Avenida Trabalhador são-carlense, 400, 13566-590, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Altamir G B JuniorScientific Computing Group, São Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo (USP), PO Box 369, 13560-970, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Alex J F FarfánInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of São Paulo (USP), USP, Avenida Trabalhador são-carlense, 400, 13566-590, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Odemir M BrunoScientific Computing Group, São Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo (USP), PO Box 369, 13560-970, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are currently living in a state of uncertainty due to the pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. There are several factors involved in the epidemic spreading, such as the individual characteristics of each city/country. The true shape of the epidemic dynamics is a large, complex system, considerably hard to predict. In this context, Complex networks are a great candidate for analyzing these systems due to their ability to tackle structural and dynamic properties. Therefore, this study presents a new approach to model the COVID-19 epidemic using a multi-layer complex network, where nodes represent people, edges are social contacts, and layers represent different social activities. The model improves the traditional SIR, and it is applied to study the Brazilian epidemic considering data up to 05/26/2020, and analyzing possible future actions and their consequences. The network is characterized using statistics of infection, death, and hospitalization time. To simulate isolation, social distancing, or precautionary measures, we remove layers and reduce social contact's intensity. Results show that even taking various optimistic assumptions, the current isolation levels in Brazil still may lead to a critical scenario for the healthcare system and a considerable death toll (average of 149,000). If all activities return to normal, the epidemic growth may suffer a steep increase, and the demand for ICU beds may surpass three times the country's capacity. This situation would surely lead to a catastrophic scenario, as our estimation reaches an average of 212,000 deaths, even considering that all cases are effectively treated. The increase of isolation (up to a lockdown) shows to be the best option to keep the situation under the healthcare system capacity, aside from ensuring a faster decrease of new case occurrences (months of difference), and a significantly smaller death toll (average of 87,000).

Indexed as

BrazilComplex networkCOVID-19Epidemic spreadingSars-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33204050
PMCPMC7659518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.