Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204023›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2021

Metastasis: crosstalk between tissue mechanics and tumour cell plasticity.

Bircan Coban, Cecilia Bergonzini, Annelien J M Zweemer, Erik H J Danen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. MechanoMR microparticle (MbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bircan Coban *Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cecilia Bergonzini *Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Annelien J M ZweemerLeiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Erik H J DanenLeiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. e.danen@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding (Dutch Cancer Society) 10967KWF Kankerbestrijding (Dutch Cancer Society) 11957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the fact that different genetic programmes drive metastasis of solid tumours, the ultimate outcome is the same: tumour cells are empowered to pass a series of physical hurdles to escape the primary tumour and disseminate to other organs. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been proposed to drive the detachment of individual cells from primary tumour masses and facilitate the subsequent establishment of metastases in distant organs. However, this concept has been challenged by observations from pathologists and from studies in animal models, in which partial and transient acquisition of mesenchymal traits is seen but tumour cells travel collectively rather than as individuals. In this review, we discuss how crosstalk between a hybrid E/M state and variations in the mechanical aspects of the tumour microenvironment can provide tumour cells with the plasticity required for strategies to navigate surrounding tissues en route to dissemination. Targeting such plasticity provides therapeutic opportunities to combat metastasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell PlasticityEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasmsReceptor Cross-TalkTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID33204023
PMCPMC7782541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.