Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33203708›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open quality2020

Comparison of active versus passive surveillance adverse event reporting in a paediatric ambulatory chiropractic care setting: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Katherine A Pohlman, Linda Carroll, Ross T Tsuyuki, Lisa Hartling, Sunita Vohra

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open quality, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05607355 (Measurement of Spinal Mobilization Biomechanical Parameters in the Preschool Pediatric Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05607355 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Measurement of Spinal Mobilization Biomechanical Parameters in the Preschool Pediatric Population

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresRan2022 to 2023Enrolled47ConditionsPediatric ALL
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine A PohlmanResearch Center, Parker University, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1536-112X
Linda CarrollSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ross T TsuyukiDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lisa HartlingDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8341-3991
Sunita VohraFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada svohra@ualberta.ca.
University of Alberta · CAParker University · US

Funding

CIHR TGSTAIR 112758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis pragmatic, cluster, stratified randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared the quantity and quality of adverse event (AE) reports after chiropractic manual therapy in children less than 14 years of age, using active versus passive surveillance reporting systems.

methodData were collected between November 2014 and July 2017 from 60 consecutive paediatric patient visits to participating chiropractors. Those allocated to active surveillance collected AE information with three paper-based questionnaires (two from patients, one from chiropractors) to identify any new or worsening symptoms after treatment. Passive surveillance involved AE information reported by chiropractors on a web-based system. To assess quality of reporting, AE reports greater than mild were reviewed by content experts. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of AE reports in active versus passive surveillance.

resultsNinety-six chiropractors agreed to participate and enrolled in the study: 34 chiropractors in active surveillance with 1894 patient visits from 1179 unique patients and 35 chiropractors in passive surveillance with 1992 patient visits from 1363 unique patients. In the active arm, AEs were reported in 8.8% (n=140, 95% CI 6.72% to 11.18%) of patients/caregivers, compared with 0.1% (n=2, 95% CI 0.02% to 0.53%) in the passive arm (p<0.001). The quality of AE reports was not evaluated because the five AE reports reviewed by the content experts were determined to be of mild severity.

conclusionWe found that active surveillance resulted in significantly more AE reports than passive surveillance. Further prospective active surveillance research studies should be conducted with children receiving chiropractic manual therapy to understand mechanisms and risk factors for moderate and severe AEs, and to further explore how and when to solicit patient safety information.

Indexed as

ChiropracticChildDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient SafetyProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAdverse eventsepidemiology and detectionPatient safetyRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID33203708
PMCPMC7674099
OpenAlexW3104325437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.