Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33203661›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2020

Immune profiling of uveal melanoma identifies a potential signature associated with response to immunotherapy.

Yong Qin, Kathryn Bollin, Mariana Petaccia de Macedo, Fernando Carapeto, Kevin B Kim, Jason Roszik, Khalida M Wani, Alexandre Reuben, Sujan T Reddy, Michelle D Williams and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Promotion of human choroidal melanoma cell metastases by FOXP3International journal of ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yong QinPharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4743-938X
Kathryn BollinMedical Oncology, Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA.
Mariana Petaccia de MacedoTranslational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Fernando CarapetoTranslational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Kevin B KimCenter for Melanoma Research and Treatment, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jason RoszikMelanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Khalida M WaniTranslational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Alexandre ReubenThoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sujan T ReddyNeurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michelle D WilliamsDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael T TetzlaffTranslational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Wei-Lien WangTranslational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Dan S GombosDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Ophthalmology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Bita EsmaeliOrbital Oncology & Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Alexander J LazarTranslational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Patrick HwuMelanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0554-2856
Sapna P PatelMelanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA sppatel@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1339-1517
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · USScripps MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas at El Paso · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Unlocking Tumor Immunophenotype in Responders versus Non-Responders in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint BlockadeR21CA208609 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI PATEL, SAPNA · 2016 to 2017
$378k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R21 CA208609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, no systemic therapy, including immunotherapy, exists to improve clinical outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) patients. To understand the role of immune infiltrates in the genesis, metastasis, and response to treatment for UM, we systematically characterized immune profiles of UM primary and metastatic tumors, as well as samples from UM patients treated with immunotherapies.

methodsRelevant immune markers (CD3, CD8, FoxP3, CD68, PD-1, and PD-L1) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry on 27 primary and 31 metastatic tumors from 47 patients with UM. Immune gene expression profiling was conducted by NanoString analysis on pre-treatment and post-treatment tumors from patients (n=6) receiving immune checkpoint blockade or 4-1BB and OX40 dual costimulation. The immune signature of UM tumors responding to immunotherapy was further characterized by Ingenuity Pathways Analysis and validated in The Cancer Genome Atlas data set.

resultsBoth primary and metastatic UM tumors showed detectable infiltrating lymphocytes. Compared with primary tumors, treatment-naïve metastatic UM showed significantly higher levels of CD3+, CD8+, FoxP3+ T cells, and CD68+ macrophages. Notably, levels of PD-1+ infiltrates and PD-L1+ tumor cells were low to absent in primary and metastatic UM tumors. No metastatic organ-specific differences were seen in immune infiltrates. Our NanoString analysis revealed significant differences in a set of immune markers between responders and non-responders. A group of genes relevant to the interferon-γ signature was differentially up-expressed in the pre-treatment tumors of responders. Among these genes, suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 was identified as a marker potentially contributing to the response to immunotherapy. A panel of genes that encoded pro-inflammatory cytokines and molecules were expressed significantly higher in pre-treatment tumors of non-responders compared with responders.

conclusionOur study provides critical insight into immune profiles of UM primary and metastatic tumors, which suggests a baseline tumor immune signature predictive of response and resistance to immunotherapy in UM.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedUveal MelanomaUveal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumorimmunotherapymelanomatranslational medical researchtumor biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33203661
PMCPMC7674090
OpenAlexW3099602684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.