Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33203638›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Beyond the numbers-understanding women's experiences of accessing care for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB): a qualitative study.

Claire Henry, Regina Jefferies, Alec Ekeroma, Sara Filoche

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Abnormal uterine bleeding diagnoses and care following COVID-19 vaccination.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Interventions to improve access to care for abnormal uterine bleeding: A systematic scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire HenryObstetrics, Gynaecology and Women's Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand claire.henry@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-9854-1379
Regina JefferiesObstetrics, Gynaecology and Women's Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Alec EkeromaNational University of Samoa, Apia, Samoa.
Sara FilocheObstetrics, Gynaecology and Women's Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0874-6494
University of Otago · NZNational University of Samoa · WS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo gain a deeper understanding of women's experiences of accessing care for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in order to inform future strategies to improve care pathways, including the early detection of endometrial cancer.

designWe conducted semistructured interviews with 15 women who attended their first gynaecological specialist consultation for AUB at Wellington Regional Hospital between October and December 2019. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore experiences and barriers to seeking care.

resultsThe median age of the participant cohort was 45 years, with women self-identifying as New Zealand European (9/15), Māori (2/15) and Pasifika (4/15). All women had sought investigation for their AUB in primary care, for some women this was over a timeframe of many years. For all women, AUB had a significant and traumatic impact on their quality of life including their relationships and their work or education. Women described how they felt they often received inadequate care for AUB, and reported negative experiences with their general practitioner. Timely access was further compounded by feelings of embarrassment and that AUB was a taboo subject, and being able to discuss it with family, friends and their general practitioners was difficult.

conclusionWomen in our cohort experienced a multitude of compounding influences that acted as barriers to them having access to appropriate and timely care. Information campaigns that create awareness around 'abnormal periods' alongside better health provider practice guidelines for AUB investigation need to be a priority.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeUterine HemorrhageAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchReferral and Consultationgynaecologyprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID33203638
PMCPMC7674079
OpenAlexW3103914702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.