Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33203635›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunisation (MI4MI) study: a protocol for an implementation study of a clinician vaccine communication intervention for prenatal care settings.

Sarah E Brewer, Jessica R Cataldi, Mary Fisher, Russell E Glasgow, Kathleen Garrett, Sean T O'Leary

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04302675 (Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunizations), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04302675 nacompletednot on this map

Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunizations (MI4MI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2020 to 2022Enrolled1,350ConditionsMaternal ImmunizationArmsPrevention, Maternal Immunization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah E BrewerFamily Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA sarah.brewer@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0063-6626
Jessica R CataldiPediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Mary FisherFamily Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Russell E GlasgowFamily Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Kathleen GarrettColorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Sean T O'LearyAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Outcomes Research Consortium · USColorado School of Public Health · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Pragmatic Implementation Science Approaches to Assess and Enhance Value of Cancer Prevention and Control in Rural Primary CareP50CA244688 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI GLASGOW, RUSSELL E · 2019 to 2023
$4.9M
Adapting Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunization (MI4MI)R21AI141822 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI O'LEARY, SEAN T · 2019 to 2020
$437k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244688NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI141822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVaccination against influenza and pertussis in pregnancy offers a 'two-for-one' opportunity to protect mother and child. Pregnant patients have increased risk of severe disease from influenza and newborns have increased risk of severe disease from both influenza and pertussis. Obstetricians need communication tools to support their self-efficacy and effectiveness in communicating the importance of immunisation during pregnancy and ultimately improving maternal vaccination rates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We describe the protocol for a pragmatic study testing the feasibility and potential impact of a clinician communication strategy on maternal vaccination uptake. This study will be conducted in five prenatal care settings in Colorado, USA. The Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunisation strategy involves training prenatal care providers to use motivational interviewing in the vaccine conversation with pregnant patients. Our primary outcomes will be the adoption and implementation of the intervention measured using the Enhanced RE-AIM/Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model for dissemination and implementation. Secondary outcomes will include provider time spent, fidelity to Motivational Interviewing and self-efficacy measured through audio recorded visits and provider surveys, patients' visit experience based on audio recorded visits and follow-up interviews, and maternal vaccine uptake as measured through chart reviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the following institutional review boards: Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed manuscripts and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04302675.

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingPrenatal CareChildColoradoCommunicationFemaleHumansImmunizationInfant, NewbornPregnancyVaccinationepidemiologyinfectious diseasesmaternal medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID33203635
PMCPMC7674098
OpenAlexW3099474070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.