Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33203573›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2021

A TAD Skeptic: Is 3D Genome Topology Conserved?

Ittai E Eres, Yoav Gilad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Paradigm Lost.Cancers · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ittai E EresDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Cummings Life Science Center, 928 E. 58th St., Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Yoav GiladDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Cummings Life Science Center, 928 E. 58th St., Chicago, IL 60637, USA; Section of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., N417, MC6091, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Electronic address: gilad@uchicago.edu.

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICS AND REGULATIONT32GM007197 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ROTHMAN-DENES, LUCIA B. B · 1985 to 2020
$17.0M
Characterizing and Understanding Variation in Gene Regulatory Mechanisms Within and Between Species'R35GM131726 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Yoav Gilad · 2019 to 2026
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131726NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The notion that topologically associating domains (TADs) are highly conserved across species is prevalent in the field of 3D genomics. However, what exactly is meant by 'highly conserved' and what are the actual comparative data that support this notion? To address these questions, we performed a historical review of the relevant literature and retraced numerous citation chains to reveal the primary data that were used as the basis for the widely accepted conclusion that TADs are highly conserved across evolution. A thorough review of the available evidence suggests the answer may be more complex than what is commonly presented.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyConserved SequenceGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansProtein DomainsChromatin3D genome architectureevolutiongene regulationHi-CTADstopologically associating domains

Identifiers

PMID33203573
PMCPMC8120795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.