Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33203457›Full record

ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2020

Bioprospecting the antimicrobial, antibiofilm and antiproliferative activity of Symplocos racemosa Roxb. Bark phytoconstituents along with their biosafety evaluation and detection of antimicrobial components by GC-MS.

Henna Sood, Yashwant Kumar, Vipan Kumar Gupta, Daljit Singh Arora

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phytochemical and Pharmacological Insights intoMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Plant-Origin Components: New Players to Combat Antibiotic Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Henna SoodMicrobial Technology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, 143005, India.
Yashwant KumarNational Salmonella & Escherichia Centre and Diagnostic Reagents Laboratory, Central Research Institute, Kasauli, HP, 173204, India.
Vipan Kumar GuptaDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, Dr. G.C.Negi College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh KrishiVishvavidyalaya, Palampur, HP, 176062, India.
Daljit Singh AroraMicrobial Technology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, 143005, India. daljit_02@yahoo.co.in.ORCID 0000-0001-7711-8638
Guru Nanak Dev University · INCentral Potato Research Institute · INChaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya · IN

Funding

University Grants Commission 8015/Estt./A-2 dated 16/04/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlants provide a ray of hope to combat the ever increasing antibiotic resistance and Symplocos racemosa is a valuable medicinal plant. The study focused on highlighting the importance of this plant's phytoconstituents as potential source of novel antimicrobials against planktonic as well as biofilm forming microorganisms, along with their antiproliferative activity. The biosafety of the phytoconstituents was also established, followed by detection of probable antimicrobial components.

methodsThe best organic extractant and major groups of phytoconstituents were tested for their antimicrobial activity against reference microbial strains and drug-resistant clinical isolates. The anti-proliferative potential of the most active group of phytoconstituents was evaluated against cancerous cell lines. The in vitro biosafety of phytoconstituents was evaluated by Ames and MTT assay, while in vivo biosafety of the most active phytoconstituents, i.e., flavonoids was determined by acute oral toxicity. Further, the probable antimicrobial components in the flavonoids were detected by TLC and GC-MS.

resultsEthyl acetate extract was the most effective among various organic extracts, whereas phytoconstituents such as flavonoids, cardiac glycosides, saponins, tannins, triterpenes and phytosterols were the major groups present, with flavonoids being the most potent antimicrobials. The phytoconstituents displayed a significant antibiofilm potential, as exhibited by inhibition of initial cell attachment, disruption of the pre-formed biofilms and reduced metabolic activity of biofilms. The phytoconstituents were significantly active against the drug-resistant strains of E.coli, MRSA and Salmonella spp. Further, flavonoids showed significant cytotoxic effect against the cancerous cell lines but were non-cytotoxic against Vero (normal) cell line. All the test preparations were biosafe, as depicted by the Ames test and MTT assay. Also, flavonoids did not induce any abnormality in body weight, clinical signs, biochemical parameters and organs' histopathology of the Swiss albino mice during in vivo acute oral toxicity studies. The flavonoids were resolved into 4 bands (S1-S4), where S3 was the most active and its GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of a number of compounds, where Bicyclo [2.2.1]heptan-2-one,1,7,7-trimethyl-, (1S)- was the most abundant.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the phytoconstituents from Symplocos racemosa bark could act as potential source of antimicrobial as well as antiproliferative metabolites.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsBiofilmsBioprospectingCell LineCell ProliferationContainment of BiohazardsFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMaleMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhytochemicalsPlant BarkPlant ExtractsAnti-Infective AgentsPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsAcute oral toxicity, AntibiofilmAntimicrobialCytotoxicityDrug resistant strainsSymplocos racemosa

Identifiers

PMID33203457
PMCPMC7672880
OpenAlexW3105874167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.