Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33203419›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

A survey of knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding malaria and bed nets on Bubaque Island, Guinea-Bissau.

Harry Hutchins, Grace Power, Thomas Ant, Eunice Teixeira da Silva, Adriana Goncalves, Amabelia Rodrigues, James Logan, David Mabey, Anna Last

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Harry HutchinsLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. harry.hutchins@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0607-6124
Grace PowerLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Thomas AntUniversity of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Eunice Teixeira da SilvaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Adriana GoncalvesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Amabelia RodriguesProjecto de Saúde Bandim, Apartado, 8611004, Bissau Codex, Guinea-Bissau.
James LoganLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
David MabeyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Anna LastLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
University of London · GBBandim Health Project · GWUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P023843/1Medical Research Council MR/S005013/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria remains a significant public health problem in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa. Government control measures include bed net distribution campaigns, however, local knowledge, attitudes and practices towards bed nets and malaria are uncharacterized on the remote Bijagos Archipelago.

methodsKnowledge, attitude and practice questionnaires were conducted with household heads, aiming to explore the understanding of malaria and factors influencing bed net uptake and usage. Nets were observed in situ to appraise net quality and behaviour. All 14 villages and one semi-urban neighbourhood on Bubaque Island were included. One in 5 households containing school-aged children were randomly selected.

resultsOf 100 participants, 94 were aware of malaria and 66 of those considered it a significant or severe problem, primarily because of its impact on health and income. Transmission, symptoms and risk factors were well known, however, 28.0% of participants felt under-informed. Some 80.0% reported contact with distribution campaigns, with inter-village variability. Campaign contact was associated with feeling well informed (OR 3.44; P = 0.024) and inversely with perceiving malaria a household (OR 0.18; P = 0.002) or regional problem (OR 0.25; P = 0.018). Every household contained nets; every identifiable example was a long-lasting insecticide-treated net (LLIN), however, 23.0% of households contained at least one expired net. Replacements were in demand; 89.0% of households reported that all residents used nets, and average occupancy was 2.07 people per net; 65.2% stated that the repurposing of bed nets was common. Correctly using bed nets, defined by age, integrity and demonstration, was 35.0% and strongly associated with completing intermittent preventative treatment in pregnancy (RR 3.63; P = 0.014).

conclusionsKnowledge of malaria is good in these communities. Bed nets are used widely and are valued for their role in preventing malaria. However, their use is frequently sub-optimal and offers a target for improving malaria control by adapting popular distribution campaigns to provide more education alongside fresh LLINs. The impact of this could be significant as LLINs represent the mainstay of malaria prevention in Guinea-Bissau; however, the persistence of malaria despite the high uptake of LLINs seen in this study suggests that novel supplementary approaches must also be considered.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGuinea-BissauHumansIslandsMalariaMaleMiddle AgedMosquito ControlMosquito NetsYoung AdultAttitudesBed netGuinea-bissauHouseholdKnowledgeMalariaPractices

Identifiers

PMID33203419
PMCPMC7670770
OpenAlexW3106254982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.