Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33203327›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Emotion in animal contests.

Andrew Crump, Emily J Bethell, Ryan Earley, Victoria E Lee, Michael Mendl, Lucy Oldham, Simon P Turner, Gareth Arnott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Once an optimist, always an optimist? Studying cognitive judgment bias in mice.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew CrumpCentre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.
Emily J BethellSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.
Ryan EarleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, USA.
Victoria E LeeAnimal Behaviour and Welfare, Scotland's Rural College, UK.
Michael MendlBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, UK.
Lucy OldhamAnimal Behaviour and Welfare, Scotland's Rural College, UK.
Simon P TurnerAnimal Behaviour and Welfare, Scotland's Rural College, UK.
Gareth ArnottInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 851145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotions encompass cognitive and behavioural responses to reward and punishment. Using contests as a case-study, we propose that short-term emotions underpin animals' assessments, decision-making and behaviour. Equating contest assessments to emotional 'appraisals', we describe how contestants appraise more than resource value and outcome probability. These appraisals elicit the cognition, drive and neurophysiology that governs aggressive behaviour. We discuss how recent contest outcomes induce long-term moods, which impact subsequent contest behaviour. Finally, we distinguish between integral (objectively relevant) and incidental (objectively irrelevant) emotions and moods (affective states). Unlike existing ecological models, our approach predicts that incidental events influence contest dynamics, and that contests become incidental influences themselves, potentially causing maladaptive decision-making. As affective states cross contexts, a more holistic ethology (incorporating emotions and moods) would illuminate animal cognition and behaviour.

Indexed as

AggressionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCognitionCompetitive BehaviorEmotionsFemaleaffective stateassessmentcognitionresource-holding potentialresource valuewinner/loser effects

Identifiers

PMID33203327
PMCPMC7116454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.