Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33203162›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Core Values that Influence the Patient-Healthcare Professional Power Dynamic: Steering Interaction towards Partnership.

Angela Odero, Manon Pongy, Louis Chauvel, Bernard Voz, Elisabeth Spitz, Benoit Pétré, Michèle Baumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Quantitative Study Exploring and Comparing Key Factors in Medication Management in the Irish Healthcare Setting.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angela OderoDepartment of Social Sciences, Institute for Research on Sociology and Economic Inequalities (IRSEI), University of Luxembourg, 4365 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Manon PongyDepartment of Social Sciences, Institute for Research on Sociology and Economic Inequalities (IRSEI), University of Luxembourg, 4365 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-9378-7572
Louis ChauvelDepartment of Social Sciences, Institute for Research on Sociology and Economic Inequalities (IRSEI), University of Luxembourg, 4365 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Bernard VozDepartment of Public Health, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Elisabeth SpitzDepartment of Health Psychology, Metz Saulcy Campus, University of Lorraine, 54395 Grand Est, France.
Benoit PétréDepartment of Public Health, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Michèle BaumannDepartment of Social Sciences, Institute for Research on Sociology and Economic Inequalities (IRSEI), University of Luxembourg, 4365 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-4733-6276

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare has long been marked by the authoritative-physician-passive-patient interaction, with patients seeking help and physicians seeking to restore patients back to health. However, globalisation, social movements, and technological advancements are transforming the nature of this relationship. We aim to identify core values that influence the power dynamic between patients and healthcare professionals, and determine how to steer these interactions towards partnership, a more suitable approach to current healthcare needs. Patients with chronic diseases (10 men, 18 women) and healthcare professionals (11 men, 12 women) were interviewed, sessions transcribed, and the framework method used to thematically analyse the data. Validation was done through analyst triangulation and member check recheck. Core values identified as influencing the patient-healthcare professional power dynamic include: (A) values that empower patients (acceptance of diagnosis and autonomy); (B) values unique to healthcare professionals (HCPs) (acknowledging patients experiential knowledge and including patients in the therapeutic process); and (C) shared capitals related to their interactions (communication, information sharing and exchange, collaboration, and mutual commitment). These interdependent core values can be considered prerequisites to the implementation of the patient-as-partner approach in healthcare. Partnership would imply a paradigm shift such that stakeholders systematically examine each other's perspective, motivations, capabilities, and goals, and then adapt their interactions in this accord, for optimal outcome.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelPower, PsychologicalProfessional-Patient RelationsCommunicationFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansMaleQualitative Researchchronic diseasescore valuesNVivopatient-as-partnerpatient empowermentpatient participationpowerqualitative analysis

Identifiers

PMID33203162
PMCPMC7696821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.