Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33203073›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Kinematics and Kinetics of Bulgarian-Bag-Overloaded Sprints in Young Athletes.

Marco Duca, Athos Trecroci, Enrico Perri, Damiano Formenti, Giampietro Alberti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Should We Use the Men Load-Velocity Profile for Women in Deadlift and Hip Thrust?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Exercise Biomechanics and Physiology.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco DucaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Athos TrecrociDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6080-5260
Enrico PerriDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Damiano FormentiDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2941-937X
Giampietro AlbertiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective sprinting requires large acceleration capabilities. To accelerate, large amount of force must be produced and applied effectively. The use of different implements such as sleds and vests can increase the amount of force produced and alter sprinting effectiveness. We propose the use of increasing overload via the Bulgarian Bag (BB) as a means to modify athletes' sprint and acutely increase force and power production.

methods24 young athletes performed three sprints over 20 m in three different conditions: unloaded (BW) and loaded with BB weighing 2.5% (BB2.5) and 5% (BB5) of the athlete's body mass. Sprint times at 2.5, 5, 10, 15, and 20 m were acquired and used to compute the force-velocity relationship for the sprints. Maximal velocity (V0), peak force (F0), peak power (PP), and decrease in ratio of force (D

resultsthe additional load caused a decrease in sprint times (

conclusionsBased on those findings, BB can be an alternative method to effectively overload sprint training toward improving sprinting performance.

Indexed as

force–velocity relationshipspeed trainingtrack and fieldyouth

Identifiers

PMID33203073
PMCPMC7696270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.