Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33203046›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Nanomaterials for Treating Bacterial Biofilms on Implantable Medical Devices.

Hoai My Tran, Hien Tran, Marsilea A Booth, Kate E Fox, Thi Hiep Nguyen, Nhiem Tran, Phong A Tran

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DisarmingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Metal-Based Nanoparticles for Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Agents Delivery-An Up-to-Date Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Innovative Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Performance of Graphene/Polydimethylsiloxane Surfaces againstNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hoai My TranCentre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Hien TranCentre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Marsilea A BoothSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9778-905X
Kate E FoxSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8090-3215
Thi Hiep NguyenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, International University, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City 71300, Vietnam.
Nhiem TranSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.
Phong A TranCentre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2820-7399
Queensland University of Technology · AURMIT University · AUVietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City · VN

Funding

Advance Queensland AQRF04816-17RD2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms are involved in most device-associated infections and remain a challenge for modern medicine. One major approach to addressing this problem is to prevent the formation of biofilms using novel antimicrobial materials, device surface modification or local drug delivery; however, successful preventive measures are still extremely limited. The other approach is concerned with treating biofilms that have already formed on the devices; this approach is the focus of our manuscript. Treating biofilms associated with medical devices has unique challenges due to the biofilm's extracellular polymer substance (EPS) and the biofilm bacteria's resistance to most conventional antimicrobial agents. The treatment is further complicated by the fact that the treatment must be suitable for applying on devices surrounded by host tissue in many cases. Nanomaterials have been extensively investigated for preventing biofilm formation on medical devices, yet their applications in treating bacterial biofilm remains to be further investigated due to the fact that treating the biofilm bacteria and destroying the EPS are much more challenging than preventing adhesion of planktonic bacteria or inhibiting their surface colonization. In this highly focused review, we examined only studies that demonstrated successful EPS destruction and biofilm bacteria killing and provided in-depth description of the nanomaterials and the biofilm eradication efficacy, followed by discussion of key issues in this topic and suggestion for future development.

Indexed as

bacteriabiofilminfectionin situnanomaterialstreatment

Identifiers

PMID33203046
PMCPMC7696307
OpenAlexW3098934357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.