ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Porous Tantalum VS. Titanium Implants: Enhanced Mineralized Matrix Formation after Stem Cells Proliferation and Differentiation.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progress and challenges of tantalum-containing biomaterials in regenerative medicine applications.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- In Situ Tantalum Doping of Titanium Dioxide Nanotubes via Electrochemical Method for Enhanced Mechanical and Biological Properties.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- An Evaluation of Osseointegration Outcomes Around Trabecular Metal Implants in Human Maxillaries Reconstructed with Allograft and Platelet-Rich Fibrin.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Osseointegration Effects of 3D-Printed Porous Titanium-Tantalum Scaffolds with Different Tantalum Contents.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Evaluating Surface Properties and Cellular Responses to Surface-Treated Different Triple Periodic Minimal Surface L-PBF Ti6Al4V Lattices for Biomedical Devices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Progress in the Application of Porous Tantalum Metal in Hip Joint Surgery.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Review
- Innovative Developments in Lumbar Interbody Cage Materials and Design: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Asian spine journal · 2024Article
- 3Y-TZP/Ta Biocermet as a Dental Material: An Analysis of the In Vitro Adherence of Streptococcus Oralis Biofilm and an In Vivo Pilot Study in Dogs.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The effect of porous compliance bushings in a dental implant on the distribution of occlusal loads.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dental Implants: Modern Materials and Methods of Their Surface Modification.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Human cells with osteogenic potential in bone tissue research.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Review
- Tantalum as Trabecular Metal for Endosseous Implantable Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Preparation, modification, and clinical application of porous tantalum scaffolds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Effect of microtopography on osseointegration of implantable biomaterials and its modification strategies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Contemporary Concepts in Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Review.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- Porous tantalum structure integrated on Ti6Al4V base by Laser Powder Bed Fusion for enhanced bony-ingrowth implants: In vitro and in vivo validation.Bioactive materials · 2022Article
- The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Tantalum Particles Induced Cytotoxic and Inflammatory Effects in Human Monocytes.BioMed research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Titanium dental implants are used routinely, with surgical procedure, to replace missing teeth. Even though they lead to satisfactory results, novel developments with implant materials can still improve implant treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of porous tantalum (Ta) dental implants for osseointegration, in comparison to classical titanium (Ti). Mesenchymal stem cells from the dental pulp (DPSC) were incubated on Ta, smooth titanium (STi), and rough titanium (RTi) to assess their adhesion, proliferation, osteodifferentiation, and mineralized matrix production. Cell proliferation was measured at 4 h, 24 h, 48 h with MTT test. Early osteogenic differentiation was followed after 4, 8, 12 days by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) quantification. Cells organization and matrix microstructure were studied with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Collagen production and matrix mineralization were evaluated by immunostaining and histological staining. MTT test showed significantly higher proliferation of DPSC on Ta at 24 h and 48 h. However, APL quantification after 8 and 12 days was significantly lower for Ta, revealing a delayed differentiation, where cells were proliferating the more. After 3 weeks, collagen immunostaining showed an efficient production of collagen on all samples. However, Red Alizarin staining clearly revealed a higher calcification on Ta. The overall results tend to demonstrate that DPSC differentiation is delayed on Ta surface, due to a longer proliferation period until cells cover the 3D porous Ta structure. However, after 3 weeks, a more abundant mineralized matrix is produced on and inside Ta implants. Cell populations on porous Ta proliferate greater and faster, leading to the production of more calcium phosphate deposits than cells on roughened and smooth titanium surfaces, revealing a potential enhanced capacity for osseointegration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.