Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33202889›Full record

ArticleGenes2020

Comparative Genomics Reveals Novel Target Genes towards Specific Control of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes.

Priscila Grynberg, Roberto Coiti Togawa, Leticia Dias de Freitas, Jose Dijair Antonino, Corinne Rancurel, Marcos Mota do Carmo Costa, Maria Fatima Grossi-de-Sa, Robert N G Miller, Ana Cristina Miranda Brasileiro, Patricia Messenberg Guimaraes and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. First Draft Genome Assembly of Root-Lesion NematodeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Screening of Candidate Effectors fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Characterization of FiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Priscila GrynbergEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília DF 70770-917, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4009-9538
Roberto Coiti TogawaEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília DF 70770-917, Brazil.
Leticia Dias de FreitasInstitute of Biological Sciences, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasília, Brasília DF 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8615-0880
Jose Dijair AntoninoEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília DF 70770-917, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4992-0698
Corinne RancurelINRAE, Plant Health and Environment, University Côte d'Azur, CNRS, ISA, F-06903 Sophia-Antipolis CEDEX, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9355-5491
Marcos Mota do Carmo CostaEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília DF 70770-917, Brazil.
Maria Fatima Grossi-de-SaEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília DF 70770-917, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8184-9599
Robert N G MillerNational Institute of Science and Technology-INCT PlantStress Biotech-EMBRAPA, Brasília DF 70770-917, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5798-4552
Ana Cristina Miranda BrasileiroEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília DF 70770-917, Brazil.
Patricia Messenberg GuimaraesEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília DF 70770-917, Brazil.
Etienne G J DanchinINRAE, Plant Health and Environment, University Côte d'Azur, CNRS, ISA, F-06903 Sophia-Antipolis CEDEX, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4146-5608
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes cause extensive annual yield losses to worldwide agricultural production. Most cultivated plants have no known resistance against nematodes and the few bearing a resistance gene can be overcome by certain species. Chemical methods that have been deployed to control nematodes have largely been banned from use due to their poor specificity and high toxicity. Hence, there is an urgent need for the development of cleaner and more specific control methods. Recent advances in nematode genomics, including in phytoparasitic species, provide an unprecedented opportunity to identify genes and functions specific to these pests. Using phylogenomics, we compared 61 nematode genomes, including 16 for plant-parasitic species and identified more than 24,000 protein families specific to these parasites. In the genome of

Indexed as

AnimalsComputer SimulationGene Expression RegulationGene OntologyGene Transfer, HorizontalGenome, HelminthGenomicsHelminth ProteinsHost-Parasite InteractionsNematodaPhylogenyPlant DiseasesPlantsTylenchoideaHelminth Proteinscomparative genomicsde novo gene birthhorizontal gene transfersparasite-specific genespest controlphylogenomicsplant-parasitic nematodes

Identifiers

PMID33202889
PMCPMC7696266
OpenAlexW3094527398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.