Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33202855›Full record

ReviewToxins2020

Toxemia in Human Naturally Acquired Botulism.

Christine Rasetti-Escargueil, Emmanuel Lemichez, Michel R Popoff

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Equine botulism.Equine veterinary journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Identification of botulism C/D in 2 dogsThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Botulism in the Highlands: Understanding the High-Altitude Effect.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Membrane Vesicles Derived FromFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. IDCases · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine Rasetti-EscargueilUnité des Toxines Bactériennes, UMR CNRS 2001, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.
Emmanuel LemichezUnité des Toxines Bactériennes, UMR CNRS 2001, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.
Michel R PopoffUnité des Toxines Bactériennes, UMR CNRS 2001, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9305-8989
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human botulism is a severe disease characterized by flaccid paralysis and inhibition of certain gland secretions, notably salivary secretions, caused by inhibition of neurotransmitter release. Naturally acquired botulism occurs in three main forms: food-borne botulism by ingestion of preformed botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) in food, botulism by intestinal colonization (infant botulism and intestinal toxemia botulism in infants above one year and adults), and wound botulism. A rapid laboratory confirmation of botulism is required for the appropriate management of patients. Detection of BoNT in the patient's sera is the most direct way to address the diagnosis of botulism. Based on previous published reports, botulinum toxemia was identified in about 70% of food-borne and wound botulism cases, and only in about 28% of infant botulism cases, in which the diagnosis is mainly confirmed from stool sample investigation. The presence of BoNT in serum depends on the BoNT amount ingested with contaminated food or produced locally in the intestine or wound, and the timeframe between serum sampling and disease onset. BoNT levels in patient's sera are most frequently low, requiring a highly sensitive method of detection. Mouse bioassay is still the most used method of botulism identification from serum samples. However, in vitro methods based on BoNT endopeptidase activity with detection by mass spectrometry or immunoassay have been developed and depending on BoNT type, are more sensitive than the mouse bioassay. These new assays show high specificity for individual BoNT types and allow more accurate differentiation between positive toxin sera from botulism and autoimmune neuropathy patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsBotulinum ToxinsBotulismHumansIntestinesToxemiaWounds and InjuriesBotulinum Toxinsbotulinum neurotoxinbotulismClostridium botulinumserumtoxemia

Identifiers

PMID33202855
PMCPMC7697460
OpenAlexW3098439356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.