Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33202846›Full record

ArticleInsects2020

Foraging Bumblebees Selectively Attend to Other Types of Bees Based on Their Reward-Predictive Value.

Jose E Romero-González, Amanda L Royka, HaDi MaBouDi, Cwyn Solvi, Janne-Tuomas Seppänen, Olli J Loukola

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jose E Romero-GonzálezDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
Amanda L RoykaDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
HaDi MaBouDiDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7612-6465
Cwyn SolviDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
Janne-Tuomas SeppänenOpen Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.
Olli J LoukolaDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9094-2004
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Jyväskylä · FI

Funding

Academy of Finland 309995CONACyt, CVU 446980EPSRC Program EP/P006094/1: Brains on BoardERC Advance Grant SpaceRadarPollinator 339347HFSP programme grant RGP0022/2014Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation Olli Loukola
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using social information can be an efficient strategy for learning in a new environment while reducing the risks associated with trial-and-error learning. Whereas social information from conspecifics has long been assumed to be preferentially attended by animals, heterospecifics can also provide relevant information. Because different species may vary in their informative value, using heterospecific social information indiscriminately can be ineffective and even detrimental. Here, we evaluated how selective use of social information might arise at a proximate level in bumblebees (

Indexed as

beesbehavioral flexibilityinsectsselective attentionsocial learning

Identifiers

PMID33202846
PMCPMC7697648
OpenAlexW3100049609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.