Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33202770›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Construction within the Industrialized Building Process: A Monetization and Building Information Modelling Approach.

Fuyi Yao, Guiwen Liu, Yingbo Ji, Wenjing Tong, Xiaoyun Du, Kaijian Li, Asheem Shrestha, Igor Martek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fuyi YaoSchool of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Guiwen LiuSchool of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Yingbo JiResearch Center of Construction Industrialization and Integrated Technology (CIIT), Beijing 100144, China.
Wenjing TongResearch Center of Construction Industrialization and Integrated Technology (CIIT), Beijing 100144, China.
Xiaoyun DuSchool of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Kaijian LiSchool of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8264-7662
Asheem ShresthaSchool of Architecture & Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong Waterfront Campus, Locked Bag 20001, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6080-4068
Igor MartekSchool of Architecture & Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong Waterfront Campus, Locked Bag 20001, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Industrialization has been widely regarded as a sustainable construction method in terms of its environmental friendliness. However, existing studies mainly consider the single impact of greenhouse gas emissions or material consumption in the construction process of industrialized buildings, and pay less attention to ecological pollution and community interest, which leads to an insufficient understanding. There is an urgent need to systematically carry out accurate assessment of comprehensive construction environmental impact within industrialized building processes. Various methods, including face-to-face interviews, field research and building information modeling (BIM), were used for data collection. Four categories selected for the study included resource consumption, material loss, ecological pollution, and community interest. A life cycle assessment (LCA) model, namely input-process-output model (IPO), is proposed to analyze the construction environmental impact of the standard layer of industrialized buildings from four life cycle stages, namely, transportation, stacking, assembly and cast-in-place. The monetization approach of willingness to pay (WTP) was applied to make a quantitative comparison. Results reveal that the assembly stage has the largest impact on the environment at 66.13% among the four life cycle stages, followed by transportation at 16.39%, stacking at 10.29%, and cast-in-place at 7.19%. The key factors include power consumption, noise pollution, material loss, fuel consumption and component loss, which altogether account for more than 85% of the total impact. Relevant stakeholders can conduct their project using the same approach to determine the construction environmental performance and hence introduce appropriate measures to mitigate the environmental burden.

Indexed as

Construction IndustryEnvironmentEnvironmental PollutionIndustrial DevelopmentModels, TheoreticalConstruction MaterialsGreenhouse GasesTransportationGreenhouse Gasesbuilding information modeling (BIM)environmental impactevaluationindustrialized building

Identifiers

PMID33202770
PMCPMC7698002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.