Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33202742›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Establishing a Community Air Monitoring Network in a Wildfire Smoke-Prone Rural Community: The Motivations, Experiences, Challenges, and Ideas of Clean Air Methow's Clean Air Ambassadors.

Amanda Durkin, Rico Gonzalez, Tania Busch Isaksen, Elizabeth Walker, Nicole A Errett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Hourly PMACS ES&T air · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Can Air Quality Citizen-Sensors Turn into Clean Air Ambassadors? Insights from a Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda DurkinDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Rico GonzalezDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Tania Busch IsaksenDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Elizabeth WalkerDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Nicole A ErrettDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8247-8336
University of Washington · US

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ALI SHOJAIE · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
Environmental Health Research Experience ProgramR25ES021646 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BUSCH ISAKSEN, TANIA · 2012 to 2016
$297k
NIEHS NIH HHS 3 P30 ES 007033-25S2NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033NIEHS NIH HHS R25ES021646-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to wildfire-related air quality issues as well as those associated with winter wood stove use and prescribed and agricultural burning, Clean Air Methow's Clean Air Ambassador program established a community air monitoring network (CAMN) to provide geospatially specific air quality information and supplement data generated by the two Washington State Department of Ecology nephelometers situated in the area. Clean Air Ambassadors (CAAs) were purposefully selected to host low-cost air sensors based on their geographic location and interest in air quality. All 18 CAAs were interviewed to understand their motivations for participation, experiences using the data, challenges encountered, and recommendations for future project directions. Interview transcripts were coded, and a qualitative analysis approach was used to identify the key themes in each domain. The reported motivations for participation as a CAA included reducing personal exposure, protecting sensitive populations, interest in air quality or environmental science, and providing community benefits. CAAs used CAMN data to understand air quality conditions, minimize personal or familial exposure, and engage other community members in air quality discussions. Opportunities for future project directions included use for monitoring other seasonal air quality issues, informing or reducing other pollution-generating activities, school and community educational activities, opportunities for use by and engagement of different stakeholder groups, and mobile-friendly access to CAMN information. Limited challenges associated with participation were reported. Additional research is necessary to understand the community-level impacts of the CAMN. The findings may be informative for other rural wildfire smoke-prone communities establishing similar CAMNs.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionCommunity ParticipationEnvironmental MonitoringSmokeFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMotivationRural PopulationWashingtonAir PollutantsSmokeair qualityclean air monitoring networkcommunity sciencewildfire smoke

Identifiers

PMID33202742
PMCPMC7697345
OpenAlexW3102167126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.