ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2020
Biomarker Development for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Omics, Antigens, T-cells, and Beyond.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Genes to Proteins: The Indispensable Role of Proteogenomics in Advancing Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Prognostic and predictive significance of VEGF, CD31, and Ang-1 in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line sunitinib.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2023Article
- Advances in Cancer Diagnosis: Bio-Electrochemical and Biophysical Characterizations of Cancer Cells.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Review
- Personalized Medicine in Oncology; a Special Issue of theJournal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Determinants of resistance to VEGF-TKI and immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021Review
- Alphataxin, a Small-Molecule Drug That Elevates Tumor-Infiltrating CD4Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has evolved quickly over the last few years from a disease managed primarily with sequential oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway, to now with a combination of therapies incorporating immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Patient outcomes have improved with these innovations, however, controversy persists regarding optimal sequence and patient selection amongst the available combinations. Ideally, predictive biomarkers would aid in guiding treatment decisions and personalizing care. However, clinically-actionable biomarkers have remained elusive. We aim to review the available evidence regarding biomarkers for both TKIs and ICB and will present where the field may be headed in the years to come.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.