ArticlePolymers2020
Fabrication of Bio-Based Gelatin Sponge for Potential Use as A Functional Acellular Skin Substitute.
Article in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physicochemical Characterization of Injectable Genipin-Crosslinked Gelatin-Kelulut Honey Hydrogels for Future Cutaneous Tissue Loss.Polymers · 2025Article
- Article
- Modified gelatin hydrogel nonwoven fabrics (Genocel) as a skin substitute in murine skin defects.Regenerative therapy · 2023Article
- The Fabrication of Gelatin-Elastin-Nanocellulose Composite Bioscaffold as a Potential Acellular Skin Substitute.Polymers · 2023Article
- Characterization of Dual-Layer Hybrid Biomatrix for Future Use in Cutaneous Wound Healing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Human epidermal keratinocytes and human dermal fibroblasts interactions seeded on gelatin hydrogel for future application in skinFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Performance of hybrid gelatin-PVA bioinks integrated with genipin through extrusion-based 3D bioprinting: AnInternational journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Article
- Genipin-Crosslinking Effects on Biomatrix Development for Cutaneous Wound Healing: A Concise Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Review
- Characterisation of Rapid In Situ Forming Gelipin Hydrogel for Future Use in Irregular Deep Cutaneous Wound Healing.Polymers · 2021Article
- Synergistic Effect of Biomaterial and Stem Cell for Skin Tissue Engineering in Cutaneous Wound Healing: A Concise Review.Polymers · 2021Review
- Functional Hydrophilic Membrane for Oil-Water Separation Based on Modified Bio-Based Chitosan-Gelatin.Polymers · 2021Article
- Application of Tilapia Skin Acellular Dermal Matrix to Induce Acute Skin Wound Repair in Rats.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Gelatin possesses biological properties that resemble native skin and can potentially be fabricated as a skin substitute for full-thickness wound treatment. The native property of gelatin, whereby it is easily melted and degraded at body temperature, could prevent its biofunctionality for various applications. This study aimed to fabricate and characterise buffalo gelatin (Infanca halal certified) crosslinked with chemical type crosslinker (genipin and genipin fortified with EDC) and physicaly crosslink using the dihydrothermal (DHT) method. A porous gelatin sponge (GS) was fabricated by a freeze-drying process followed by a complete crosslinking via chemical-natural and synthetic-or physical intervention using genipin (GNP), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) (EDC) and dihydrothermal (DHT) methods, respectively. The physicochemical, biomechanical, cellular biocompatibility and cell-biomaterial interaction of GS towards human epidermal keratinocytes (HEK) and dermal fibroblasts (HDF) were evaluated. Results showed that GS had a uniform porous structure with pore size ranging between 60 and 200 µm with high porosity (>78.6 ± 4.1%), high wettability (<72.2 ± 7.0°), high tensile strain (>13.65 ± 1.10%) and 14 h of degradation rate. An increase in the concentration and double-crosslinking approach demonstrated an increment in the crosslinking degree, enzymatic hydrolysis resistance, thermal stability, porosity, wettability and mechanical strength. The GS can be tuned differently from the control by approaching the GS via a different crosslinking strategy. However, a decreasing trend was observed in the pore size, water retention and water absorption ability. Crosslinking with DHT resulted in large pore sizes (85-300 µm) and low water retention (236.9 ± 18.7 g/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.