Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33202055›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

Low-dose CT image and projection dataset.

Taylor R Moen, Baiyu Chen, David R Holmes, Xinhui Duan, Zhicong Yu, Lifeng Yu, Shuai Leng, Joel G Fletcher, Cynthia H McCollough

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 256 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SADiff: A Sinogram-Aware Diffusion Model for Low-Dose CT Image Denoising.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [A low-dose CT image restoration method based on central guidance and alternating optimization].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taylor R MoenDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Baiyu ChenDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
David R HolmesBiomedical Imaging Resource, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Xinhui DuanDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Zhicong YuDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lifeng YuDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Shuai LengDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Joel G FletcherDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Cynthia H McColloughDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Trade-offs in human observer performance, image quality metrics, and patient doseR01EB017095 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Hao Gong, Cynthia H McCollough · 2012 to 2026
$7.0M
Critical resources to evaluate CT scan techniques and dose reduction approachesU01EB017185 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MCCOLLOUGH, CYNTHIA H · 2013 to 2016
$3.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017095NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB017185NIH HHS R01 EB017095NIH HHS U01 EB017185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe a large, publicly available dataset comprising computed tomography (CT) projection data from patient exams, both at routine clinical doses and simulated lower doses. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION

methodsThe library was developed under local ethics committee approval. Projection and image data from 299 clinically performed patient CT exams were archived for three types of clinical exams: noncontrast head CT scans acquired for acute cognitive or motor deficit, low-dose noncontrast chest scans acquired to screen high-risk patients for pulmonary nodules, and contrast-enhanced CT scans of the abdomen acquired to look for metastatic liver lesions. Scans were performed on CT systems from two different CT manufacturers using routine clinical protocols. Projection data were validated by reconstructing the data using several different reconstruction algorithms and through use of the data in the 2016 Low Dose CT Grand Challenge. Reduced dose projection data were simulated for each scan using a validated noise-insertion method. Radiologists marked location and diagnosis for detected pathologies. Reference truth was obtained from the patient medical record, either from histology or subsequent imaging. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: Projection datasets were converted into the previously developed DICOM-CT-PD format, which is an extended DICOM format created to store CT projections and acquisition geometry in a nonproprietary format. Image data are stored in the standard DICOM image format and clinical data in a spreadsheet. Materials are provided to help investigators use the DICOM-CT-PD files, including a dictionary file, data reader, and user manual. The library is publicly available from The Cancer Imaging Archive (https://doi.org/10.7937/9npb-2637). POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: This CT data library will facilitate the development and validation of new CT reconstruction and/or denoising algorithms, including those associated with machine learning or artificial intelligence. The provided clinical information allows evaluation of task-based diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiation DosageThoraxTomography Scanners, X-Ray ComputedCT projection dataiterative reconstructionlow-dose CTmachine learningpatient data

Identifiers

PMID33202055
PMCPMC7985836
OpenAlexW3103645830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.