Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201879›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Investigations of the effect of the amount of biochar on soil porosity and aggregation and crop yields on fertilized black soil in northern China.

Liang Jin, Dan Wei, Dawei Yin, Baoku Zhou, JianLi Ding, Wei Wang, Jiuming Zhang, Shaojun Qiu, Chengjun Zhang, Yan Li and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Liang JinPlant Nutrition and Resources Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dan WeiPlant Nutrition and Resources Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1408-7613
Dawei YinCollege of Agricultural Science and Technology, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing, Heilongjiang, China.
Baoku ZhouThe Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Plant Nutrition of Heilongjiang Province, Heilongjiang Academy of Agriculture and Science, Soil Fertilizer and Environment Resource Institute, Harbin, China.
JianLi DingPlant Nutrition and Resources Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wei WangThe Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Plant Nutrition of Heilongjiang Province, Heilongjiang Academy of Agriculture and Science, Soil Fertilizer and Environment Resource Institute, Harbin, China.
Jiuming ZhangThe Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Plant Nutrition of Heilongjiang Province, Heilongjiang Academy of Agriculture and Science, Soil Fertilizer and Environment Resource Institute, Harbin, China.
Shaojun QiuKey Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/ Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chengjun ZhangPlant Nutrition and Resources Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yan LiCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Zhizhuang AnPlant Nutrition and Resources Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jialin GuPlant Nutrition and Resources Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lei WangPlant Nutrition and Resources Institute, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences · CNHeilongjiang Academy of Forestry · CNHeilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University · CNInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning · CNNortheast Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of chemical fertilizer and biochar is regarded as a useful soil supplement for improving the properties of soil and crop yields, and this study describes how the biochar of maize straw can be used to improve the quality of the degraded black soil. This has been achieved by examining the effects of combining different amounts of biochar with chemical fertilizer on the porosities and aggregate formation of soil and exploring how these changes positively impact on crop yields. A field trial design combining different amounts of maize straw biochar [0 (NPK), 15.75 (BC1), 31.5 (BC2), and 47.25 t ha-1 (BC3)] with a chemical fertilizer (NPK) has been used to investigate changes in the formation of soil aggregate, clay content, soil organic carbon (SOC), and crop yields in Chinese black soil over a three year period from 2013 to 2015. The results of this study show that the addition of fertilizer and biochar in 2013 to black soil results in an increased soybean and maize yields from 2013 to 2015 for all the treatments, with BC1/BC2 affording improved crop yields in 2015, while BC3 gave a lower soybean yield in 2015. Total porosities and pore volumes were increased for BC1 and BC2 treatments but relatively decreased for BC3, which could be attributed to increased soil capillary caused by the presence of higher numbers of fine soil particles. The addition of biochar had a positive influence on the numbers and mean weight diameters (MWD) of soil macroaggregates (>0.25 mm) that were present, with the ratio of SOC to TN in soil macroaggregates found to be greater than in the microaggregates. The most significant amount of carbon present in macroaggregates (>2 mm and 0.25-2 mm) was observed when BC2 was applied as a soil additive. Increasing the levels of maze straw biochar to 47.25 t ha-1 led to an increase in the total organic carbon of soil, however, the overall amount of macroaggregates and MWD were decreased, which is possibly due to localized changes in microbial habitat. The supplementation of biochar increased in the amount of aromatic C present (most significant effect observed for BC2), with the ratio of aliphatic C to aromatic C found to be enhanced due to a relative reduction in the aliphatic C content with >2 mm particle fraction. These changes in organic carbon content and soil stability were analyzed using univariate quadratic equations to explain the relationship between the type of functional groups (polysaccharide C, aliphatic C, aromatic C, aliphatic C/aromatic C) present in the soil aggregates and their MWDs, which were found to vary significantly. Overall, the results of this study indicate that the use of controlled amounts of maize-straw biochar in black soil is beneficial for improving crop yields and levels of soil aggregation, however, the use of excessive amounts of biochar results in unfavorable aggregate formation which negatively impacts the yields of crop growth. The data produced suggest that aromatic C content can be used as a single independent variable to characterize the stability of soil aggregate when biochar/fertilizer mixtures are used as soil additives to boost growth yields. Analysis of soil and crop performance in black soil revealed that the application of maize-straw biochar at a rate of 15.75 and 31.5 t ha-1 had positive effects on crop yields, soil aggregation and accumulation of aromatic C in the aggregate fractions when a soybean-maize rotation system was followed over three years.

Indexed as

AgricultureCarbonCharcoalChinaClayCrops, AgriculturalEcosystemFertilizersGlycine maxNitrogenPorositySoilZea maysbiocharCarbonCharcoalClayFertilizersNitrogenSoil

Identifiers

PMID33201879
PMCPMC7671521
OpenAlexW3101212261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.