Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201701›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2020

Automated, Accurate, and Scalable Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations Using Lambda Dynamics.

E Prabhu Raman, Thomas J Paul, Ryan L Hayes, Charles L Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. RBM45 Preferential Binding to mThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Sampling the Grand Canonical Ensemble with Multisite λ Dynamics.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026
    Article
  4. Ligand-Binding Free Energy Simulations of Membrane Proteins.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Undirected Exploration of Binding Pockets with Flexible Topology.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Core Flipping in Lead Optimization: Rank Ordering Using λ-Dynamics.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Potential distribution theory of alchemical transfer.The Journal of chemical physics · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. How to Sample Dozens of Substitutions per Site with λ Dynamics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  18. A λ-Dynamics Investigation of InsulinJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. A λ-dynamics investigation of insulinbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E Prabhu RamanBIOVIA, Dassault Systemes, 5005 Wateridge Vista Drive, San Diego, California 92121, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2303-7757
Thomas J PaulDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Ryan L HayesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Charles L BrooksDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8149-5417

Funding

Theory and Modeling of Biomolecules and their Interactions - Equipment SupplementR35GM130587 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHARLES L BROOKS · 2019 to 2026
$6.9M
Theoretical Studies of Receptor-Ligand InteractionsR01GM037554 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BROOKS, CHARLES L · 1987 to 2018
$3.8M
CHARMM Modernization, Performance, and Continued DevelopmentR01GM103695 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BROOKS, CHARLES L · 2012 to 2018
$3.1M
Computational infrastructure for biomedically-driven simulation and modelingS10OD034346 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BROOKS, CHARLES L · 2023 to 2023
$593k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037554NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103695NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130587NIH HHS S10 OD034346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate predictions of changes to protein-ligand binding affinity in response to chemical modifications are of utility in small-molecule lead optimization. Relative free-energy perturbation (FEP) approaches are one of the most widely utilized for this goal but involve significant computational cost, thus limiting their application to small sets of compounds. Lambda dynamics, also rigorously based on the principles of statistical mechanics, provides a more efficient alternative. In this paper, we describe the development of a workflow to set up, execute, and analyze multisite lambda dynamics (MSLD) calculations run on GPUs with CHARMM implemented in BIOVIA Discovery Studio and Pipeline Pilot. The workflow establishes a framework for setting up simulation systems for exploratory screening of modifications to a lead compound, enabling the calculation of relative binding affinities of combinatorial libraries. To validate the workflow, a diverse data set of congeneric ligands for seven proteins with experimental binding affinity data is examined. A protocol to automatically tailor fit biasing potentials iteratively to flatten the free-energy landscape of any MSLD system is developed, which enhances sampling and allows for efficient estimation of free-energy differences. The protocol is first validated on a large number of ligand subsets that model diverse substituents, which shows accurate and reliable performance. The scalability of the workflow is also tested to screen more than 100 ligands modeled in a single system, which also resulted in accurate predictions. With a cumulative sampling time of 150 ns or less, the method results in average unsigned errors of under 1 kcal/mol in most cases for both small and large combinatorial libraries. For the multisite systems examined, the method is estimated to be more than an order of magnitude more efficient than contemporary FEP applications. The results thus demonstrate the utility of the presented MSLD workflow to efficiently screen combinatorial libraries and explore the chemical space around a lead compound and thus are of utility in lead optimization.

Indexed as

AutomationMolecular Dynamics SimulationThermodynamicsLigandsMolecular StructureProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID33201701
PMCPMC7814773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.