Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201656›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2022

Assistive Technology Use and Provision During COVID-19: Results From a Rapid Global Survey.

Emma M Smith, Maria Luisa Toro Hernandez, Ikenna D Ebuenyi, Elena V Syurina, Giulia Barbareschi, Krista L Best, Jamie Danemayer, Ben Oldfrey, Nuha Ibrahim, Catherine Holloway and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Access to Assistive Technology during the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Voices of Users and Families.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Assistive Technology Provider Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emma M SmithAssisting Living and Learning Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2541-5723
Maria Luisa Toro HernandezIndependent Researcher, Madrid, Spain.
Ikenna D EbuenyiAssisting Living and Learning Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3329-6296
Elena V SyurinaAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6482-3909
Giulia BarbareschiGlobal Disability Innovation Hub, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9036-3566
Krista L BestCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Universite Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7205-7725
Jamie DanemayerGlobal Disability Innovation Hub, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0060-5160
Ben OldfreyGlobal Disability Innovation Hub, University College London, London, UK.
Nuha IbrahimCentre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Catherine HollowayUniversity College London Interaction Centre, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7843-232X
Malcolm MacLachlanAssisting Living and Learning Institute, Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6672-9206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted all segments of society, but it has posed particular challenges for the inclusion of persons with disabilities, those with chronic illness and older people regarding their participation in daily life. These groups often benefit from assistive technology (AT) and so it is important to understand how use of AT may be affected by or may help to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19.

methodsThis study was a rapid, international online qualitative survey in the 6 United Nations (UN) languages (English, French, Spanish, Russian, Arabic, Mandarin Chinese) facilitated by extant World Health Organization (WHO) and International Disability Alliance networks. Themes and subthemes of the qualitative responses were identified using Braun and Clarke's 6-phase analysis.

resultsFour primary themes were identified in in the data: Disruption of Services, Insufficient Emergency Preparedness, Limitations in Existing Technology, and Inadequate Policies and Systems. Subthemes were identified within each theme, including subthemes related to developing resilience in AT systems, based on learning from the pandemic.

conclusionCOVID-19 has disrupted the delivery of AT services, primarily due to infection control measures resulting in lack of provider availability and diminished one-to-one services. This study identified a need for stronger user-centred development of funding policies and infrastructures that are more sustainable and resilient, best practices for remote service delivery, robust and accessible tools and systems, and increased capacity of clients, caregivers, and clinicians to respond to pandemic and other crisis situations.

Indexed as

COVID-19Persons with DisabilitiesSelf-Help DevicesAgedHumansPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesAgeingAssistive TechnologyCrisesDisabilityHealth PolicyResilience

Identifiers

PMID33201656
PMCPMC9309903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.