Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201490›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2021

Validation of the Lebanese Medication Adherence Scale among Lebanese diabetic patients.

Liliane Ibrahim, Lina Ibrahim, Souheil Hallit, Pascale Salameh, Hala Sacre, Marwan Akel, Rola Bou Serhal, Nadine Saleh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Liliane IbrahimDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Fanar, Lebanon. liliane.ibrahim@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4551-6874
Lina IbrahimDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Fanar, Lebanon.
Souheil HallitINSPECT-LB, National Institute of Public Health, Clinical Epidemiology and Toxicology-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon.
Pascale SalamehINSPECT-LB, National Institute of Public Health, Clinical Epidemiology and Toxicology-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hala SacreINSPECT-LB, National Institute of Public Health, Clinical Epidemiology and Toxicology-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon.
Marwan AkelINSPECT-LB, National Institute of Public Health, Clinical Epidemiology and Toxicology-Liban, Beirut, Lebanon.
Rola Bou SerhalDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Fanar, Lebanon.
Nadine SalehDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Fanar, Lebanon.
Lebanese University · LBMinistry of Public Health · LBHoly Spirit University of Kaslik · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Adherence to oral antidiabetics plays a pivotal role in controlling diabetes. Healthcare workers evaluate this adherence when visited by patients. Objectives The primary objective of this study was to validate the existing LMAS-14 (Lebanese Medication Adherence Scale) in Lebanese diabetic adults. The secondary objective was to evaluate factors affecting adherence among this population. Setting The main five Lebanese governorates. Methods This study was conducted between May and September 2019, and community dwelling adult participants were enrolled using a proportionate random sample. The scale was validated using factor analysis and reliability testing, while bivariate and multivariable analyses assessed correlates of adherence. Main outcomes measures Validity of LMAS-14. Results A total of 308 participants were included, and the response rate was 91.25%. All LMAS-14 items converged over a solution of four factors, explaining a total of 64.39% of the variance (α = 0.859). The cutoff point between controlled and uncontrolled patients was set at 11. The sensitivity and specificity were good at this cutoff (71.1% and 94.74%, respectively). Results showed that 167 (57.2%) patients had good medication adherence. Advanced age (Beta = 0.046; p = 0.001) and having medical coverage (Beta = 1.452; p = 0.005) were significantly associated with higher adherence. Furthermore, adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (Beta = 1.197; p = 0.018), female gender (Beta = 2.695; p = 0.011), and taking dyslipidemia medication (Beta = 3.527; p = 0.005) predicted higher diabetes control. Conclusion This study validated the LMAS among Lebanese adult diabetic patients taking oral antidiabetic drug. Advanced age and having medical coverage were associated with higher medication adherence. Further national studies are warranted to corroborate our findings.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusMedication AdherenceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsReproducibility of ResultsHypoglycemic AgentsDiabetesLebanonLMAS-14Medication adherenceOral antidiabetic

Identifiers

PMID33201490
OpenAlexW3101850870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.