ArticleMaternal and child health journal2021
Demographic, Socioeconomic, Health Systems, and Geographic Factors Associated with Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: An Analysis of 2017 U.S. Birth Certificate Data.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing Racial/Ethnic Variation and Trends in Vaginal Birth after Cesarean in California: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Linked Birth Certificate and Hospital Discharge Records.American journal of perinatology · 2026Article
- "I was able to take it back": Seeking VBAC after experiencing dehumanizing maternity care in a primary cesarean.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2023Article
- Racial Disparities in Respectful Maternity Care During Pregnancy and Birth After Cesarean in Rural United States.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2023Observational
- Factors associated with labor after cesarean in a prospective cohort.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2022Article
- Inequities in quality perinatal care in the United States during pregnancy and birth after cesarean.PloS one · 2022Article
- How can obstetrical anaesthesiologists help in reducing the rate of caesarean delivery?Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2022Article
- Experiences of Quality Perinatal Care During the US COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2021Article
- "I had to fight for my VBAC": A mixed methods exploration of women's experiences of pregnancy and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIn order to better understand the current rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the United States, 2017 U.S. birth certificate data were used to examine sociodemographic and geographic factors associated with the outcome of a VBAC.
methodsThe 2017 Natality Limited Geography Dataset and block sequential logistic regression were used to examine sociodemographic and geographic factors associated with subsequent births in 2017 in the United States to women with a history of 1 or 2 cesareans (N = 540,711).
resultsThe adjusted odds of VBAC were 6% higher for Black women (1.06; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.08) and 18% higher for American Indian/Alaska Native women (aOR 1.18; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.27) relative to white women. Asian/Pacific Islander women were 9% less likely to have a VBAC (aOR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.94) than similar white women with a history of cesarean delivery. Latina women had a 10% less likelihood of a VBAC (aOR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.92) when compared with non-Latina women. Women with a high school education (aOR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.88) or some college (aOR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.87) were less likely to have a VBAC than women educated at a baccalaureate level or higher. Women whose births were paid for by Medicaid had a 5% increased likelihood of VBAC over women with private insurance (aOR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.07). Women who self-pay have twice the likelihood of VBAC (aOR 1.99; 95% CI: 1.92, 2.07) compared to women with private insurance. The adjusted odds of VBAC were lowest for women giving birth in Southern states (aOR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.74) and highest for women giving birth in the Midwest (aOR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.16, 1.22) relative to women in the Northeastern U.S. Thirteen percent (13%) of women who had a VBAC had a certified nurse-midwife (CNM) birth attendant, which is 44% higher than the national CNM-attended birth rate. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Significant variation exists in VBAC rates based on a number of sociodemographic and geographic factors, likely reflecting disparities in access to vaginal birth after cesarean and differences in preference regarding mode of birth after cesarean. Further research is recommended to better understand and address these disparities to improve maternity care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.