Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201402›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2021

How Do Peers Shape Mental Health Clinicians' Attitudes Toward New Treatments?

Alicia C Bunger, Elena I Navarro, Cara C Lewis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alicia C Bunger *Ohio State University, College of Social Work, 1947 College Road, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Elena I Navarro *Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Cara C LewisKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. cara.c.lewis@kp.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8920-8075
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Standardized versus Tailored Implementation of Measurement Based Care for DepressionR01MH103310 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, CARA CHARISSA · 2014 to 2017
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS 5R01MH103310-04NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through everyday interactions, mental health clinicians are exposed to their colleagues' views toward new treatments, which can influence clinicians' own attitudes and implementation especially in high-stress environments. This study examines how exposure to peers' attitudes in the workplace through three common workplace interactions (advice sharing, discussion, and friendship) shapes clinicians' (n = 163) own attitudes toward measurement-based care (MBC). Clinicians tended to have more positive attitudes toward MBC with greater exposure to peers with positive attitudes through advice-sharing and informal workplace discussions, but not through friendships. Results highlight the importance of strong workplace relationships for implementation.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMental HealthAttitude to HealthHumansWorkplaceAttitudesCliniciansImplementationSocial networks

Identifiers

PMID33201402
OpenAlexW3099925795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.