Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201377›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2021

Gynecologists' attitudes toward and use of complementary and integrative medicine approaches: results of a national survey in Germany.

Donata Grimm, Petra Voiss, Daniela Paepke, Johanna Dietmaier, Holger Cramer, Sherko Kümmel, Matthias W Beckmann, Linn Woelber, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Ulrich Freitag and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [How Common are Complementary Medicine Procedures in Bavarian Acute Care Hospitals? Results of A Bavarian-wide Website Screening].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Donata GrimmDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. donatakatharina.grimm@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4706-2335
Petra VoissDepartment of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, University of Duisburg-Essen, Am Deimelsberg 34a, 45276, Essen, Germany.
Daniela PaepkeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, Munich, Germany.
Johanna DietmaierDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Holger CramerDepartment of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, University of Duisburg-Essen, Am Deimelsberg 34a, 45276, Essen, Germany.
Sherko KümmelBreast Care Unit, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Henricistrasse 92, 45136, MastologyEssen, Germany.
Matthias W BeckmannDepartment of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Linn WoelberDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Barbara SchmalfeldtDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Ulrich FreitagDipl. Med. Ulrich Freitag, State Association Chairman of the BVF, Private Practice, Turnerweg 11a, 23970, Wismar, Germany.
Matthias KalderDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Phillips University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35033, Marburg, Germany.
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anna-Katharin TheuserInstitute for Women's Health (IFG) GmbH, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Carolin C HackDepartment of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite patients' widespread use and acceptance of complementary and integrative medicine (IM), few data are available regarding health-care professionals' current implementation of it in clinical routine. A national survey was conducted to assess gynecologists' attitudes to and implementation of complementary and integrative treatment approaches.

methodsThe Working Group on Integrative Medicine of the German Society of Gynecological Oncology conducted an online survey in collaboration with the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) in July 2019. A 29-item survey was sent to all DGGG members by email.

resultsQuestionnaires from 180 gynecologists were analyzed, of whom 61 were working office-based in private practice and 95 were employed in hospitals. Seventy percent stated that IM concepts are implemented in their routine clinical work. Most physicians reported using IM methods in gynecological oncology. The main indications for IM therapies were fatigue (n = 98), nausea and vomiting (n = 89), climacteric symptoms (n = 87), and sleep disturbances (n = 86). The most commonly recommended methods were exercise therapy (n = 86), mistletoe therapy (n = 78), and phytotherapy (n = 74). Gynecologists offering IM were more often female (P = 0.001), more often had qualifications in anthroposophic medicine (P = 0.005) or naturopathy (P = 0.019), and were more often based in large cities (P = 0.016).

conclusionsThere is strong interest in IM among gynecologists. The availability of evidence-based training in IM is increasing. Integrative therapy approaches are being implemented in clinical routine more and more, and integrative counseling services are present all over Germany. Efforts should focus on extending evidence-based knowledge of IM in both gynecology and gynecological oncology.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelComplementary TherapiesGynecologyPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttitudeBreast cancerComplementary and alternative medicineGynecologic oncologyIntegrative medicineSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID33201377
PMCPMC7985114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.