ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020
Contemporary use of coronary computed tomography angiography in the planning of percutaneous coronary intervention.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computed Tomography Angiography in the Catheterization Laboratory: A Guide Towards Optimizing Coronary Interventions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Evolving Role of Coronary CT Angiography in Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A State-of-the-Art Review.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Prediction of side branch occlusion in bifurcational lesions during percutaneous coronary interventions by preprocedural coronary computed tomography using the CT bifurcation score.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2023Article
- Contemporary percutaneous management of coronary calcification: current status and future directions.Open heart · 2023Review
- Introduction topical issue on CT plaque burden.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Planning of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is largely based on anatomical information obtained with invasive coronary angiography. Over the last decade, intracoronary information obtained from both imaging and physiological techniques has gradually gained recognition for this purpose. Yet, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is still ignored by most interventionalists as a tool in the planning of PCI strategies. This has occurred despite major developments in CCTA, including physiological assessment, plaque characterisation, etc. Furthermore, it is foreseeable that many more patients referred to the catheterisation laboratory will have had a prior CCTA study. In this review we discuss the distinct advantages provided by CCTA in studying coronary artery structure and function. We revisit the most frequent scenarios of complex PCI and establish analogies between the use of intracoronary diagnostics and CCTA in setting procedural strategy, and in anticipating specific challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33201348What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.