Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201324›Full record

ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2020

[Lichen planus: fundamentals, clinical variants, histological features, and differential diagnosis].

Almut Böer-Auer, Constantin Lütgerath

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Almut Böer-AuerKlinik für Hautkrankheiten, Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Von-Esmarch-Str. 58, 48149, Münster, Deutschland. boer@dermatologikum.de.
Constantin LütgerathDermatologikum Hamburg, Stephansplatz 5, 20354, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lichen planus (LP) is a relatively common inflammatory skin disease in dermatological practice. The typical presentation of LP is usually diagnosed clinically. Less common variants such as LP inversus, atrophic LP, the palmoplantar manifestation or childhood LP may pose diagnostic difficulties so that a biopsy is taken to confirm the diagnosis. Differentiation from LP-like drug eruption may be challenging and biologicals have to be considered as triggers. Etiology and pathogenesis of LP are discussed based on recent literature. Finally, an overview of therapeutic options for different variants of the condition includes most recent approaches to treatment.

Indexed as

DermatitisDrug EruptionsLichen PlanusBiopsyChildDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansBiologicalsChildhood lichen planusDrug eruptionLichen planus inversusLichen planus-like

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.