Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201312›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2021

Quest for the Best Evolutionary Model.

Rafael Zardoya

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rafael ZardoyaDepartamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain. rafaz@mncn.cisc.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6212-9502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the early 1980s, DNA sequencing became a routine and the increasing computing power opened the door to reconstruct molecular phylogenies using probabilistic approaches. DNA sequence alignments provided a large number of positions containing phylogenetic information, which could be extracted using explicit statistical models that described the mutation process using appropriate parameters. Consequently, an active quest started for building increasingly improved (more realistic) statistical models of nucleotide substitution. The simplest model assumed that nucleotide frequencies were in equilibrium and one single category of substitutions. Subsequent models allowed either unequal nucleotide frequencies or separate rates for transitions and transversions. The HKY85 model (Hasegawa et al. in J Mol Evol 22:160, 1985) combined elegantly both options into a single model, which became one of the most useful ones and has been the choice in many molecular phylogenetic studies ever since. The use of improved substitution models such as HKY85 allows reconstructing more accurate and reliable phylogenies, which in turn provide robust frameworks for understanding how biological diversity evolved and for performing a wealth of comparative studies in different disciplines such as ecology, biogeography, developmental biology, biochemistry, genomics, epidemiology, and biomedicine.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, GeneticBase SequenceEvolution, MolecularPhylogenySequence AlignmentEvolutionary modelsMaximum likelihoodMolecular phylogeneticsTransitionsTransversions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.