Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201303›Full record

SynthesisPediatric surgery international2021

Single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port approach for acute appendicitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shafquat Zaman, Ali Yasen Y Mohamedahmed, Stephen Stonelake, Ananth Srinivasan, Abdul Karim Sillah, Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Hajibandeh

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Acute appendicitis-advances and controversies.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shafquat Zaman *Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Ali Yasen Y Mohamedahmed *Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK. dr.aliyasen1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1219-7571
Stephen Stonelake *Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Ananth SrinivasanDepartment of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Abdul Karim SillahDepartment of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Shahab HajibandehDepartment of General Surgery, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Rhyl, Denbighshire, UK.
Shahin HajibandehDepartment of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate comparative outcomes of single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy (SPLA) and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy (CLA) in the management of acute appendicitis in children.

methodsA comprehensive systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with subsequent meta-analysis of outcomes were conducted in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards. Operative time, surgical site infection, intra-abdominal collection, incisional hernia, length of hospital stay (LOS), additional port/s and conversion to open were the evaluated outcome parameters.

resultsFour RCTs reporting a total number of 520 patients who underwent SPLA (n = 260) or CLA (n = 260) were included. There was no difference between SPLA and CLA group in post-operative collection (risk difference (RD) - 0.00, P = 0.94), surgical site infection (RD 0.02, P = 0.25), incisional hernia (RD 0.00 P = 1), LOS (mean difference (MD) 0.73 P = 0.93), need for additional port/s (RD 0.04, P = 0.24) and conversion to open (RD 0.00, P = 1). However, there was a significantly longer operative time in the SPLA group (MD 9.80, P = 0.00001). The certainty of the evidence was judged to be moderate for all outcomes.

conclusionsSPLA and CLA seem to have comparable efficacy and safety in children with acute appendicitis although the former may be associated with longer procedure time. Future high-quality RCTs with adequate sample sizes are required to provide stronger evidence in favour of an intervention.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAppendectomyAppendicitisChildFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeAppendicectomyLaparoscopic surgerySingle port

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.