ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2021
[Practical skills training : How suitable is Peyton's four-step approach for residents in urology?]
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Sex-specific differences in surgical confidence: results of the Endo Workshop of the German Society of Residents in Urology 2022].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Article
- Efficacy and influencing factors of the four-step approach combining the situational simulation teaching method in the clinical practice of standardized training for residents.Health science reports · 2022Article
- MatricS-A novel tool for monitoring professional role development in surgical disciplines.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of residency is to acquire medical skills and abilities. One didactic model is "Peyton's four-step approach". The aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate a modified Peytonian approach for group interactions. The aim was to develop a course for the acquisition of practical skills and training assistants in suture techniques for urology.
methodsA prospective study was conducted with a total of 38 participants and 6 tutors. In a modified four-step Peytonian approach, various suturing and knotting techniques were taught in a structured manner. Tutors evaluated the procedural activity using observation sheets. In addition, the learning method was evaluated by the participants and the tutors at the end of the course. In order to check the long-term learning success, a renewed survey of the participants was conducted after 6 months.
results80% of the participants rated the modified teaching method as useful and 83% of the tutors rated the procedural implementation as good. Fluid movement sequences were difficult independent of the technique taught. After 6 months, the participants significantly improved their procedural skills in all techniques that were taught.
conclusionThis paper defines a four-step Peyton-based approach to teaching practical skills such as suturing and knotting used in urological training. The modified teaching method improved practical skills used in urology. This method should be considered in continuing education to promote self-confidence and increase the competence in surgical skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.