Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201289›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Is detethering necessary before deformity correction in congenital scoliosis associated with tethered cord syndrome: a meta-analysis of current evidence.

Kaustubh Ahuja, Syed Ifthekar, Samarth Mittal, Gagandeep Yadav, P Venkata Sudhakar, Sitanshu Barik, Pankaj Kandwal

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Answer to the letter to the editor of T. Xu et al. concerning "Is detethering necessary before deformity correction in congenital scoliosis associated with tethered cord syndrome: a meta-analysis of current evidence" by Ahuja K, et al. (2021) Eur Spine J 30(3):599-611.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  6. Letter to the editor concerning "Is detethering necessary before deformity correction in congenital scoliosis associated with tethered cord syndrome: a meta-analysis of current evidence" by Ahuja K, et al. (2021) Eur Spine J 30(3):599-611.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaustubh AhujaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.
Syed IfthekarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.
Samarth MittalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.
Gagandeep YadavDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.
P Venkata SudhakarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.
Sitanshu BarikDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.
Pankaj KandwalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India. pankajkandwal27@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8801-6909
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with congenital scoliosis (CS) and tethered cord syndrome (TCS) undergoing deformity correction with (NI group) versus without (NNI group) prior neurosurgical intervention aimed at detethering the cord.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. The databases PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched until March 2020. Inclusion criteria was studied describing performance of deformity correction and fusion surgery for congenital scoliosis with tethered cord syndrome with or without prior detethering procedure. Studies describing growth sparing procedures or congenital scoliosis associated with non-tethering pathologies such as syrinx were excluded. Case reports and series with less than 10 subjects were also excluded. NIH quality assessment tool was used for assessing quality of individual study.

resultsSixteen studies were included for analysis of which eight were found to be retrospective case series (level IV evidence) and retrospective case-control studies (level III evidence) each. Overall proportional meta-analysis found no significant difference in correction rate, operative duration, blood loss or complication rate between the NI and NNI groups. However, subgroup analysis performed after inclusion of only level III evidence studies revealed significantly lesser operative duration and blood loss with comparable correction and complication rate in NNI group.

conclusionDeformity correction and fusion surgery may be performed safely and effectively in CS with TCS patients without the need of a prior detethering procedure.

Indexed as

Neural Tube DefectsScoliosisSyringomyeliaHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCongenital scoliosisDetetheringIntraspinal anomaliesNeurological complicationsSurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID33201289
OpenAlexW3098505560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.