Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201285›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Fully automated prediction of liver fibrosis using deep learning analysis of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Stefanie J Hectors, Paul Kennedy, Kuang-Han Huang, Daniel Stocker, Guillermo Carbonell, Hayit Greenspan, Scott Friedman, Bachir Taouli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Stefanie J HectorsBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Paul KennedyBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Kuang-Han HuangBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel StockerBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Guillermo CarbonellBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Hayit GreenspanMedical Imaging Processing Lab, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Scott FriedmanDivision of Liver Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Bachir TaouliBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. bachir.taouli@mountsinai.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-1333
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USClalit Health Services · ILCornell University · USTel Aviv University · ILUniversidad de Murcia · ESUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo (1) develop a fully automated deep learning (DL) algorithm based on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase (HBP) MRI and (2) compare the diagnostic performance of DL vs. MR elastography (MRE) for noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.

methodsThis single-center retrospective study included 355 patients (M/F 238/117, mean age 60 years; training, n = 178; validation, n = 123; test, n = 54) who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced abdominal MRI, including HBP and MRE, and pathological evaluation of the liver within 1 year of MRI. Cropped liver HBP images from a custom-written fully automated liver segmentation were used as input for DL. A transfer learning approach based on the ImageNet VGG16 model was used. Different DL models were built for the prediction of fibrosis stages F1-4, F2-4, F3-4, and F4. ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the performance of DL in training, validation, and test sets and of MRE liver stiffness in the test set.

resultsAUC values of DL were 0.99/0.70/0.77 (F1-4), 0.92/0.71/0.91 (F2-4), 0.91/0.78/0.90 (F3-4), and 0.98/0.83/0.85 (F4) for training/validation/test sets, respectively. The AUCs of MRE liver stiffness in the test set were 0.86 (F1-4), 0.87 (F2-4), 0.92 (F3-4), and 0.86 (F4). AUCs of MRE and DL were not significantly different for any of the fibrosis stages (p > 0.134).

conclusionsThe fully automated DL models based on HBP gadoxetic acid MRI showed good-to-excellent diagnostic performance for staging of liver fibrosis, with similar diagnostic performance to MRE. After validation in independent sets, the DL algorithm may allow for noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment without the need for additional MRI hardware. KEY POINTS: • The developed deep learning algorithm, based on routine standard-of-care gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI data, showed good-to-excellent diagnostic performance for noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. • The diagnostic performance of the deep learning algorithm was equivalent to that of MR elastography in a separate test set.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElasticity Imaging TechniquesGadolinium DTPAHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAArtificial intelligenceDeep learningLiver cirrhosisLiver diseasesMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID33201285
OpenAlexW3103706824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.