Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201282›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Evaluation of competence in ultrasound-guided procedures-a generic assessment tool developed through the Delphi method.

Niklas Kahr Rasmussen, Leizl Joy Nayahangan, Jonathan Carlsen, Olle Ekberg, Knut Brabrand, Elisabeth Albrecht-Beste, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Lars Konge

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05303974 (Competency-based Assessment of Ultrasound-guided Joint Injection Skills), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05303974 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Competency-based Assessment of Ultrasound-guided Joint Injection Skills: A Validity Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2022 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsMusculoskeletal DiseasesArmsUltrasound guided joint injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Conducting Delphi surveys in medical education research.GMS journal for medical education · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Niklas Kahr RasmussenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. niklas.kahr.rasmussen@regionh.dk.
Leizl Joy NayahanganCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Centre for HR and Education, the Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jonathan CarlsenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Olle EkbergDepartment of Translational Medicine, Division of Medical Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Knut BrabrandDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Elisabeth Albrecht-BesteDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael Bachmann NielsenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars KongeDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKCapital Region of Denmark · DKLund University · SEOslo University Hospital · NORigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a generic and objective tool for assessing competence in percutaneous ultrasound-guided procedures.

methodsInterventional ultrasound experts from the Nordic countries were invited to participate in a three-round Delphi process. A steering committee was formed to manage the process. In round 1, the experts were asked to suggest all aspects to consider when assessing competence in US-guided procedures. Suggestions were analyzed and condensed into assessment items. In round 2, the expert panel rated these items on a 1-5 scale and suggested new items. Items with a mean rating of ≤ 3.5 were excluded. In round 3, the expert panel rated the list items and suggested changes to the items.

resultsTwenty-five experts were invited, and response rates in the three rounds were 68% (17 out of 25), 100% (17 out of 17), and 100% (17 out of 17). The three-round Delphi process resulted in a 12-item assessment tool, using a five-point rating scale. The final assessment tool evaluates pre-procedural planning, US technique, procedural technique, patient safety, communication, and teamwork.

conclusionsExpert consensus was achieved on a generic tool for assessment of competence in percutaneous ultrasound-guided procedures-the Interventional Ultrasound Skills Evaluation (IUSE). This is the initial step in ensuring a valid and reliable method for assessment of interventional US skill. KEY POINTS: • Through a Delphi process, expert consensus was achieved on the content of an assessment tool for percutaneous ultrasound-guided procedures-the Interventional Ultrasound Skills Evaluation (IUSE) tool. • The IUSE tool is comprehensive and covers pre-procedural planning, US technique, procedural technique, patient safety, communication, and teamwork. • This is an important step in ensuring valid and reliable assessment of interventional US skills.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceUltrasonography, InterventionalConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansUltrasonographyDelphi techniqueEducational measurementEducation, medicalUltrasonographyUltrasonography, interventional

Identifiers

PMID33201282
OpenAlexW3105659057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.