Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201278›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Automatic detection and classification of rib fractures based on patients' CT images and clinical information via convolutional neural network.

Qing-Qing Zhou, Wen Tang, Jiashuo Wang, Zhang-Chun Hu, Zi-Yi Xia, Rongguo Zhang, Xinyi Fan, Wei Yong, Xindao Yin, Bing Zhang and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Artificial intelligence fracture recognition on computed tomography: review of literature and recommendations.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Qing-Qing ZhouDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 168, gushan Road, Nanjing, 211100, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6699-9617
Wen TangInstitute of Advanced Research, Beijing Infervision Technology Co Ltd, Yuanyang International Center, Beijing, 100025, China.
Jiashuo WangResearch Center of Biostatistics and Computational Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, No.639, Long Mian Avenue, Nanjing, 211198, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zhang-Chun HuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 168, gushan Road, Nanjing, 211100, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zi-Yi XiaDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 168, gushan Road, Nanjing, 211100, Jiangsu Province, China.
Rongguo ZhangInstitute of Advanced Research, Beijing Infervision Technology Co Ltd, Yuanyang International Center, Beijing, 100025, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6566-8843
Xinyi FanInstitute of Advanced Research, Beijing Infervision Technology Co Ltd, Yuanyang International Center, Beijing, 100025, China.
Wei YongDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68, Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Xindao YinDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68, Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6958-5201
Bing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, the Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3953-0290
Hong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 168, gushan Road, Nanjing, 211100, Jiangsu Province, China. jnyyfsk@126.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1770-6582

Funding

State Key Laboratory of Novel Software Technology (CN) Nanjing Health Commissionthe National Natural Science Foundation of China 81720108022,91649116, 81571040, 81973145the Social Development Project of Science and Technology in Jiangsu Province BE2016605, BE201707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for the automatic detection and classification of rib fractures in actual clinical practice based on cross-modal data (clinical information and CT images). MATERIALS: In this retrospective study, CT images and clinical information (age, sex and medical history) from 1020 participants were collected and divided into a single-centre training set (n = 760; age: 55.8 ± 13.4 years; men: 500), a single-centre testing set (n = 134; age: 53.1 ± 14.3 years; men: 90), and two independent multicentre testing sets from two different hospitals (n = 62, age: 57.97 ± 11.88, men: 41; n = 64, age: 57.40 ± 13.36, men: 35). A Faster Region-based CNN (Faster R-CNN) model was applied to integrate CT images and clinical information. Then, a result merging technique was used to convert 2D inferences into 3D lesion results. The diagnostic performance was assessed on the basis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, free-response ROC (fROC) curve, precision, recall (sensitivity), F1-score, and diagnosis time. The classification performance was evaluated in terms of the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.

resultsThe CNN model showed improved performance on fresh, healing, and old fractures and yielded good classification performance for all three categories when both clinical information and CT images were used compared to the use of CT images alone. Compared with experienced radiologists, the CNN model achieved higher sensitivity (mean sensitivity: 0.95 > 0.77, 0.89 > 0.61 and 0.80 > 0.55), comparable precision (mean precision: 0.91 > 0.87, 0.84 > 0.77, and 0.95 > 0.70), and a shorter diagnosis time (average reduction of 126.15 s).

conclusionsA CNN model combining CT images and clinical information can automatically detect and classify rib fractures with good performance and feasibility in actual clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • The developed convolutional neural network (CNN) performed better in fresh, healing, and old fractures and yielded a good classification performance in three categories, if both (clinical information and CT images) were used compared to CT images alone. • The CNN model had a higher sensitivity and matched precision in three categories than experienced radiologists with a shorter diagnosis time in actual clinical practice.

Indexed as

Rib FracturesAdultAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceComputed tomographyRib fracturesROC curveX-ray

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.