Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201274›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Comparative study of the bacterial communities throughout the gastrointestinal tract in two beef cattle breeds.

Yixiao Zhu, Zhisheng Wang, Rui Hu, Xueying Wang, Fengpeng Li, Xiangfei Zhang, Huawei Zou, Quanhui Peng, Bai Xue, Lizhi Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yixiao ZhuKey Laboratory for Cattle Low Carbon Cultivation and Safety Production of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Zhisheng WangKey Laboratory for Cattle Low Carbon Cultivation and Safety Production of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China. zswangsicau@126.com.
Rui HuKey Laboratory for Cattle Low Carbon Cultivation and Safety Production of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Xueying WangKey Laboratory for Cattle Low Carbon Cultivation and Safety Production of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Fengpeng LiKey Laboratory for Cattle Low Carbon Cultivation and Safety Production of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Xiangfei ZhangKey Laboratory for Cattle Low Carbon Cultivation and Safety Production of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Huawei ZouKey Laboratory for Cattle Low Carbon Cultivation and Safety Production of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Quanhui PengKey Laboratory for Cattle Low Carbon Cultivation and Safety Production of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Bai XueKey Laboratory for Cattle Low Carbon Cultivation and Safety Production of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Lizhi WangKey Laboratory for Cattle Low Carbon Cultivation and Safety Production of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

China Agriculture (Beef Cattle/Yak) Research System CARS-37National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFD0502005Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2018NZ0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigation of the compositional and functional characteristics of the gastrointestinal bacterial community in beef cattle breeds can improve our understanding of the influence of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) regions and host breeds on the bacterial community. In this study, 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing was used to characterize the bacterial communities in the rumen, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum, and colon of Xuanhan yellow cattle (XHC) and Simmental crossbred cattle (SXC). The results showed that the diversity of the bacterial population was different in GIT regions of XHC and SXC (P < 0.05). In total, ten bacterial phyla, sixteen bacterial genera, and nine metabolic pathways were identified in the core bacteria. The phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria were predominant, but their proportions were different in GIT regions (P < 0.05). The diversity, structure, and composition of the bacteria in the rumen were similar between the breeds (P > 0.05), and the indices in the intestine showed significant differences (P < 0.05). Moreover, the composition and structure of the bacterial communities in the rumen, small intestine, and large intestine were different regardless of the breed. Thus, the bacterial communities were different among the gastrointestinal regions in each breed, and the bacterial community in the rumen had more stable characteristics than that in the intestine between two breeds. Further studies may focus on the minor microbial communities and the functions of GIT bacteria to better understand gut-microbe interactions. KEY POINTS: • Differences in bacteria among gastrointestinal regions differ in cattle breeds. • Differences between the breeds in the ruminal bacteria are less pronounced than differences in the intestinal bacteria.

Indexed as

BacteriaGastrointestinal TractAnimalsCattleDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRumenDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial communitiesBeef cattle breedsDynamic distributionGastrointestinal tract regions

Identifiers

PMID33201274
OpenAlexW3099525085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.