Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201265›Full record

ReviewRheumatology international2021

Statistical data presentation: a primer for rheumatology researchers.

Durga Prasanna Misra, Olena Zimba, Armen Yuri Gasparyan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. TheJournal of Korean medical science · 2025
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Data Distribution: Normal or Abnormal?Journal of Korean medical science · 2024
    Review
  6. Replication and Reproducibility and the Self-Correction of Science: What CanJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2023
    Article
  7. COVID-19's impact on interest in gastrointestinal topics.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  8. Google searches for bruxism, teeth grinding, and teeth clenching during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Formulating Hypotheses for Different Study Designs.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Durga Prasanna MisraDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, India. durgapmisra@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5035-7396
Olena ZimbaDepartment of Internal Medicine No. 2, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4188-8486
Armen Yuri GasparyanDepartments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-6018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical presentation of data is key to understanding patterns and drawing inferences about biomedical phenomena. In this article, we provide an overview of basic statistical considerations for data analysis. Assessment of whether tested parameters are distributed normally is important to decide whether to employ parametric or non-parametric data analyses. The nature of variables (continuous or discrete) also determines analysis strategies. Normally distributed data can be presented using means with standard deviations (SD), whereas non-parametric measures such as medians (with range or interquartile range) should be used for non-normal distributions. While the SD provides a measure of data dispersion, the standard error provides estimates of the 95% confidence interval i.e. the actual mean in the population. Univariable analyses should be directed to denote effect sizes, as well as test a priori hypothesis (i.e. null hypothesis significance testing). Univariable analyses should be followed up by suitable adjusted multivariable analyses such as linear or logistic regression. Linear correlation statistics can help assess whether two variables change hand in hand. Concordance rather than correlation should be used to compare outcome measures of disease states. Prior sample size calculation to ensure adequate study power is recommended for studies which have analogues in the literature with SDs. Statistical considerations for systematic reviews should include appropriate use of meta-analysis, assessment of heterogeneity, publication bias assessment when there are more than ten studies, and quality assessment of studies. Since statistical errors are responsible for a significant proportion of retractions, appropriate statistical analysis is mandatory during study planning and data analysis.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalModels, StatisticalHumansObservational Studies as TopicResearch DesignRheumatologySystematic Reviews as TopicRegression analysisStatistical data interpretationStatistics as topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.