Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33201180›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Are dropout imputation methods for scRNA-seq effective for scHi-C data?

Chenggong Han, Qing Xie, Shili Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Advances in methods and applications of single-cell Hi-C data analysis].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Single-cell Hi-C data analysis: safety in numbers.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chenggong HanOhio State University.
Qing XieOhio State University.
Shili LinTranslational Data Analytics Institute at the Ohio State University.ORCID 0000-0003-2467-4491

Funding

Omics analysis of three-dimensional transcriptional regulationR01GM114142 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI JIN, VICTOR, LIN, SHILI · 2015 to 2024
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of dropout events is a serious problem for single-cell Hi-C (scHiC) data due to insufficient sequencing depth and data coverage, which brings difficulties in downstream studies such as clustering and structural analysis. Complicating things further is the fact that dropouts are confounded with structural zeros due to underlying properties, leading to observed zeros being a mixture of both types of events. Although a great deal of progress has been made in imputing dropout events for single cell RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data, little has been done in identifying structural zeros and imputing dropouts for scHiC data. In this paper, we adapted several methods from the single-cell RNA-seq literature for inference on observed zeros in scHiC data and evaluated their effectiveness. Through an extensive simulation study and real data analysis, we have shown that a couple of the adapted single-cell RNA-seq algorithms can be powerful for correctly identifying structural zeros and accurately imputing dropout values. Downstream analysis using the imputed values showed considerable improvement for clustering cells of the same types together over clustering results before imputation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationRNA-SeqRNA, Small CytoplasmicSingle-Cell AnalysisSoftwareHumansRNA, Small Cytoplasmicdropoutimputationsingle cell Hi-Csingle cell RNA-seqstructural zero

Identifiers

PMID33201180
PMCPMC8293815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.