ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2020
Comparison of Continuous ECG Monitoring by Wearable Patch Device and Conventional Telemonitoring Device.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic Validation of Wearable Continuous ECG Monitoring Patch, ATP-C120, in High Risk Patients for New-onset Atrial Fibrillation
Analysis of the Efficacy and Stability of a Single-Channel Patch-Type Wearable Electrocardiogram Monitor
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Performance of Patch-Type and Lead-Type Wearable Electrocardiogram Devices for Arrhythmia Detection in Routine Clinical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- WMRE2030: integrating wearable devices, multi-omics, and artificial intelligence-driven real-time feedback into a daily-scale closed-loop framework for a new era of precision exercise.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Advancing cardiac arrhythmia management: The integration of wearable technology and remote monitoring.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of wearable ECG and assessment of ventricular repolarization and its cardiovascular risks post cold stress.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Substantiation and Effectiveness of Remote Monitoring System Based on IoMT Using Portable ECG Device.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Cloud-Integrated Smart Nanomembrane Wearables for Remote Wireless Continuous Health Monitoring of Postpartum Women.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Validation of a New and Straightforward Algorithm to Evaluate Signal Quality during ECG Monitoring with Wearable Devices Used in a Clinical Setting.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Value of a Wearable Continuous Electrocardiogram Monitoring Device (AT-Patch) for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in High-Risk Patients: Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Clinical applications of smart wearable sensors.iScience · 2023Review
- Electrocardiogram Devices for Home Use: Technological and Clinical Scoping Review.JMIR cardio · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Algorithms for Estimation of Demographic and Anthropometric Features from Electrocardiograms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Surveillance of Arrhythmia in Patients After Myocardial Infarction Using Wearable Electrocardiogram Patch Devices: Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR cardio · 2022Article
- Smart Wearables for Cardiac Monitoring-Real-World Use beyond Atrial Fibrillation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Introduction of Wearable Device in Cardiovascular Field for Monitoring Arrhythmia.Chonnam medical journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDetection of arrhythmias is crucial for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. However, conventional devices do not provide sufficient diagnostic accuracy while patients should suffer from bothersome diagnostic process. We sought to evaluate diagnostic capability and safety of the new adhesive electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring device in patients who need ECG monitoring during admission.
methodsWe enrolled 10 patients who admitted to Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and required continuous ECG monitoring between October 31, 2019 and December 18, 2019. New adhesive ECG monitoring device and conventional ECG monitoring device were simultaneously applied to the patients and maintained for 48 hours. From each patient, 48 pairs of ECG signal were collected and analyzed by two cardiologists independently. Discrepancy of diagnosis and frequency of noise or signal loss were compared between the two devices.
resultsFrom analyzable ECG data, discrepancy of arrhythmia diagnosis was not observed between the two devices. Noise rate was higher in conventional ECG monitoring device (2.5% vs. 17.3%,
conclusionA newer adhesive ECG monitoring device demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional ECG monitoring device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.