Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33200589›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2020

Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Classification of Alzheimer's Disease Spectrum.

Jongmin Lee, Hyemin Jang, Sung Hoon Kang, Jaeho Kim, Ji Sun Kim, Jun Pyo Kim, Hee Jin Kim, Sang Won Seo, Duk L Na

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jongmin Lee *Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0892-6217
Hyemin Jang *Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3152-1274
Sung Hoon KangDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2481-0302
Jaeho KimDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-2359
Ji Sun KimDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7991-171X
Jun Pyo KimDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4376-3107
Hee Jin KimDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3186-9441
Sang Won SeoDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8747-0122
Duk L NaDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-7592
Samsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HI14C2746Ministry of Health and Welfare HI19C1132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are increasingly used in clinical practice for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aimed to 1) determine cutoff values of CSF biomarkers for AD, 2) investigate their clinical utility by estimating a concordance with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), and 3) apply ATN (amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration) classification based on CSF results.

methodsWe performed CSF analysis in 51 normal controls (NC), 23 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 65 AD dementia (ADD) patients at the Samsung Medical Center in Korea. We attempted to develop cutoff of CSF biomarkers for differentiating ADD from NC using receiver operating characteristic analysis. We also investigated a concordance between CSF and amyloid PET results and applied ATN classification scheme based on CSF biomarker abnormalities to characterize our participants.

resultsCSF Aβ42, total tau (t-tau) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) significantly differed across the three groups. The area under curve for the differentiation between NC and ADD was highest in t-tau/Aβ42 (0.994) followed by p-tau/Aβ42 (0.963), Aβ42 (0.960), t-tau (0.918), and p-tau (0.684). The concordance rate between CSF Aβ42 and amyloid PET results was 92%. Finally, ATN classification based on CSF biomarker abnormalities led to a majority of NC categorized into A-T-N-(73%), MCI as A+T-N-(30%)/A+T+N+(26%), and ADD as A+T+N+(57%).

conclusionCSF biomarkers had high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating ADD from NC and were as accurate as amyloid PET. The ATN subtypes based on CSF biomarkers may further serve to predict the prognosis.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesArea Under CurveBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsPositron-Emission TomographyROC CurveSeverity of Illness Indextau ProteinsAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)BiomarkersPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloidBiomarkersCerebrospinal FluidClassificationPositron Emission Tomographytau

Identifiers

PMID33200589
PMCPMC7669457
OpenAlexW3093129379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.